Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism

2011-01-22 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote: IMHO not related to the proposal: - potlatch can not handle the proposal/nested relations correctly: The latest version of Potlatch (Potlatch 2) handles nested relations excellently. About 10 seconds' research would have told you that. Richard _

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism

2011-01-22 Thread Vincent Privat
2011/1/22 Michał Borsuk > > In urban regions it is common that a bus line has different routes for >> the both directions (often one way). >> > > This doesn't matter as OSM itself is not routing software. > > The more exact the OSM map is, the >> more likely it is that the two directions do not

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism

2011-01-22 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 01/22/2011 09:32 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote: I try to seperate the criticism from the spam around my proposal: - stop_area is not needed/too complicated: [...]And it does not seam to be too complicated, We have so many advanced issues in comparison to the total number of PT objects b

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism

2011-01-22 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Am 22.01.2011 09:32, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy): I try to seperate the criticism from the spam around my proposal: - stop_area is not needed/too complicated: According to taginfo there are already 64'500 stop area relations in the OSM database (10'500 public transport/oxomoa, 1'500 stop place, 51'

[Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism

2011-01-22 Thread Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
I try to seperate the criticism from the spam around my proposal: - stop_area is not needed/too complicated: According to taginfo there are already 64'500 stop area relations in the OSM database (10'500 public transport/oxomoa, 1'500 stop place, 51'500 unified stoparea). For me this is a reason