Re: [Talk-transit] Historic railways and route=train - is this good practice?

2 Sep 2021, 20:08 by skqu...@rushpost.com: > On 9/2/21 12:03, Tony Shield wrote: > >> Guys >> >> Wandering through OPNVKarte I noted a railway line running through >> Kielder Water - an impossibility, further investigation showed the >> railway ways as abandoned or razed and part of a relation

Re: [Talk-transit] station=tram in Berlin

I would delete such objects. If someone really want to represent entire stop, then there is public_transport=stop_area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5746202 Though I would rather ask local community (Berling or

Re: [Talk-transit] bus=yes opinion

Ad thread) bus=yes is not needed if highway=bus_stop is present Also public_transport=platform is not needed anyway, like entire failed pt2 19 paź 2020, 17:54 od mikl...@gmail.com: > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 23:30:29 HKT Snusmumriken wrote: > >> On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 02:33 -0300, Agustin

Re: [Talk-transit] Bus routes in Málaga: Should we add "stop_area" relations?

Jul 18, 2020, 19:17 by dcapil...@gmail.com: > Hi! > > I'll try to check the bus routes in Malagá. [1] I haven't checked them for a > long time because I have been busy with other mapping tasks and because there > were many changes in the central area of Málaga. The bus routes changed too >

Re: [Talk-transit] bus stop name

Jul 17, 2020, 03:15 by talk-transit@openstreetmap.org: >     In the USA bus stops (flag stops) are located for the most part at named  > intersections, that is at where the street >   > sign is. >   >    so you DO know where you are. but on the OSM standard map the bus stop tag > depending on

Re: [Talk-transit] bus=yes opinion

It is useless but harm is minimal - just a pointless tag. As long as mapper is not removing actually used highway=bus_stop it should be OK. Jul 11, 2020, 07:33 by aguztin...@gmail.com: > What are your opinion of adding bus=yes along with public_transport=platform > + highway=bus_stop? > I

Re: [Talk-transit] bus=yes opinion

And I in turn consider public_transport tag family as adding nothing useful and encouraging pointless duplication. I would be happy to consider them as deprecated, but I am not sure is there a clear support for that. And I am certain that most of people would be against deprecating

Re: [Talk-transit] Making bus lines more specific

Apr 28, 2020, 22:53 by mailingli...@iivq.net: > Hello Robin, > > I highly agree with you. > The main reason for PTv2 not having as widespread adoption as it could have > is that it is not rendered, that is to say, it is not rendered on OSM_carto > (Osmand's rendering of PTv2 is

Re: [Talk-transit] Importing GTFS feed stops in Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Mar 18, 2020, 15:44 by rockyt...@gmail.com: > Well, the city website claims it's CC-BY (version not specified), but I > believe all GTFS feeds are free to use, as it is a requirement of the > spec, no? > Even if that is requirement of the spec (not confirming this!), it is possible that they