omplex.
Had a similar case on the german mailing list, yesterday [1].
If you tell us the timetable in words we could help you with the syntax.
Cheers fly
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2015-April/110887.html
___
Talk-tra
ter will tell you "go to station
> ". It's very easy to do that. And it's much nicer than
> some name a mapper has made up.
I would also try to use one name and add all the extra information with
other tags.
In the end you will always use a stop-area-relation to group
Hey
We already have public_transport=stop_area and the site-relation in use
with stations. For the buildings with several levels we even have
level-relations.
As these areas are sometimes quite complex we won't be able to map them
all in a simple way.
cu fly
On 18.12.2013 21:58, Richard
adly this was not the case so far.
If you keep on adding both schemes simultaneously you will not notice
the problem and there will be no reason for developers to adjust the
software.
One site [1] did at least start to render the new scheme along the old
on, so there is still hope that others
and platform and I meet
several stop which have only one platform on one side of the road for
both directions.
Cheers fly
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
g two distinct objects would be difficult to understand, because which
> object you get will then depend on the tools syntax (either one of them or
> both), and nobody expects a second difficult-to-find shadow object to exist.
For new created objects I only use the new schem
you want with it.
Or you can use the Mirror-Plugin for JOSM to query overpass and start
working with the data right away.
cu
fly
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
to tag it but to tag that the route is only served
on certain days and / or certain time a tag like operating_hours or
operating_times comes to my mind similar to opening_hours.
My two cents
fly
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstre
gt; then includes members of this relation. Does this address your issue?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route_master
This is used to get all route variants in one relation
cu
fly
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstree
gt;> If everything is mostly ok what I'll probably do is copy the station
>> node tags to the building outline and delete the node.
reusing the nodes is better (see above).
There is also the possibility to use a relation (public_transport=stop_area)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi
Am 27.01.2011 18:56, schrieb ant:
> Hi,
>
> On 27.01.2011 10:49, Richard Mann wrote:
>> I think we've got three broad decisions:
>>
>> 1) Whether the use of stop area / group relations should be
>> a) widespread
>> b) exceptional
>
> b
a) possibility to micromap.
>> 2) Whether route relations s
Am 11.06.2010 02:25, schrieb Roland Olbricht:
>>> You may want to follow
>>> British/German standard. There is a tag that identifies stops uniquely,
>>> sorry can't recall at the moment. The last time I saw it was
>>> Siegburg/Bonn train station.
>
> Do you mean the "ref" tag as on node 160621? I'
12 matches
Mail list logo