Re: [Talk-transit] Simple timetable for ferry?

2015-04-14 Thread fly
omplex. Had a similar case on the german mailing list, yesterday [1]. If you tell us the timetable in words we could help you with the syntax. Cheers fly [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2015-April/110887.html ___ Talk-tra

Re: [Talk-transit] Close stations having the same name

2013-12-19 Thread fly
ter will tell you "go to station > ". It's very easy to do that. And it's much nicer than > some name a mapper has made up. I would also try to use one name and add all the extra information with other tags. In the end you will always use a stop-area-relation to group

Re: [Talk-transit] Tagging of railway station

2013-12-19 Thread fly
Hey We already have public_transport=stop_area and the site-relation in use with stations. For the buildings with several levels we even have level-relations. As these areas are sometimes quite complex we won't be able to map them all in a simple way. cu fly On 18.12.2013 21:58, Richard

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

2013-12-11 Thread fly
adly this was not the case so far. If you keep on adding both schemes simultaneously you will not notice the problem and there will be no reason for developers to adjust the software. One site [1] did at least start to render the new scheme along the old on, so there is still hope that others

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

2013-12-11 Thread fly
and platform and I meet several stop which have only one platform on one side of the road for both directions. Cheers fly ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Tagging of railway station

2013-12-11 Thread fly
g two distinct objects would be difficult to understand, because which > object you get will then depend on the tools syntax (either one of them or > both), and nobody expects a second difficult-to-find shadow object to exist. For new created objects I only use the new schem

Re: [Talk-transit] Extract Public Transport Information from a OSM file of city

2013-08-30 Thread fly
you want with it. Or you can use the Mirror-Plugin for JOSM to query overpass and start working with the data right away. cu fly ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Alternative routes

2013-03-07 Thread fly
to tag it but to tag that the route is only served on certain days and / or certain time a tag like operating_hours or operating_times comes to my mind similar to opening_hours. My two cents fly ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstre

Re: [Talk-transit] Using route part relations in Route relations

2012-07-24 Thread fly
gt; then includes members of this relation. Does this address your issue? > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route_master This is used to get all route variants in one relation cu fly ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstree

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Light-rail station

2012-05-31 Thread fly
gt;> If everything is mostly ok what I'll probably do is copy the station >> node tags to the building outline and delete the node. reusing the nodes is better (see above). There is also the possibility to use a relation (public_transport=stop_area) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi

Re: [Talk-transit] Summary of Public Transport Proposal Criticism -> a real example from Zürich

2011-01-27 Thread fly
Am 27.01.2011 18:56, schrieb ant: > Hi, > > On 27.01.2011 10:49, Richard Mann wrote: >> I think we've got three broad decisions: >> >> 1) Whether the use of stop area / group relations should be >> a) widespread >> b) exceptional > > b a) possibility to micromap. >> 2) Whether route relations s

Re: [Talk-transit] Bus stops in North America from GTFS data

2010-06-11 Thread fly
Am 11.06.2010 02:25, schrieb Roland Olbricht: >>> You may want to follow >>> British/German standard. There is a tag that identifies stops uniquely, >>> sorry can't recall at the moment. The last time I saw it was >>> Siegburg/Bonn train station. > > Do you mean the "ref" tag as on node 160621? I'