Hi,
fyi, the automatch script for importing canada's NRN datasets is
available to copy from - hopefully it can help. (to deal with
duplicates)
I still havent figured out how to get the .txt file that converts the
database file to osm tags. -the shp2osm script.
Thanks,
Sam
ps hopefully the talk-c
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:55:51PM -0600, Ian Dees wrote:
> It looks like the solution is to use Advanced Multipolygons:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Advanced_multipolygons
>
> Does anyone want to start writing an algorithm to nicely slice up polygons
> into "
It looks like the solution is to use Advanced Multipolygons:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Advanced_multipolygons
Does anyone want to start writing an algorithm to nicely slice up polygons
into "small enough" chunks?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Rev. Theodore
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Rev. Theodore Book wrote:
> I used a modified version of your MassGIS script - which did result in
> some big ways. I think we would need to find a faster way of uploading
> if we wanted to complete the whole country in a reasonable length of time.
Whic
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:24:21AM -0600, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Christopher Schmidt <
> crschm...@metacarta.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > What script did you use for doing the polygons themselves? Did i t
> > support splitting of large polygons into smaller ways?
> >
>
> Chri
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Christopher Schmidt <
crschm...@metacarta.com> wrote:
>
> What script did you use for doing the polygons themselves? Did i t
> support splitting of large polygons into smaller ways?
>
Chris, I was thinking about how to implement this in my shp-to-osm convertor
thi
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37:05AM -0500, Theodore Book wrote:
> I think it would be great to get it all in as soon as possible. I do
> see a few limiting factors, though:
>
> * In some places, a lot of work has been done manually entering water
> features. While I expect the NHD data is gener
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Rev. Theodore Book wrote:
> It looks like you are right up the road from me! I can send you the scripts
> that I used, if you like.
Sure.
>
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> * In some places, a lot
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
> * In some places, a lot of work has been done manually entering water
> features. While I expect the NHD data is generally better, we have the
> tough issue of respecting other people's work (and not duplicating
> things in the database)
I
I think it would be great to get it all in as soon as possible. I do
see a few limiting factors, though:
* In some places, a lot of work has been done manually entering water
features. While I expect the NHD data is generally better, we have the
tough issue of respecting other people's work (
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
> If you haven't been following the wiki page, I have been doing some work
> on the NHD dataset, and feel that I have gotten a decent OSM conversion
> of the Etowah river watershed (north and northwest of Atlanta). I am
> going ahead and uplo
If you haven't been following the wiki page, I have been doing some work
on the NHD dataset, and feel that I have gotten a decent OSM conversion
of the Etowah river watershed (north and northwest of Atlanta). I am
going ahead and uploading that basin. If you are interested in the
conversion,
12 matches
Mail list logo
