Hi all,The talk-us list brought up a good point, that we (for the
GeoBase/CanVec) import. ... BTW, EVERYTHING that is available on the
geogratis.ca site which is under the same license is up for grabs.
We haven't yet listest EVERYTHING which COULD be imported. ...
Anyway, in Canada parks/forests/p
National parks and national forests are clearly are two different
things. That is something that Google and others do not recognize. They
just do one green for everything and they don't have BLM or open space
land.
I know in the past open space land has been a posilbility as being
included in OSM
Karl Newman writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
>
>> I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
>>
>> It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus, but
>> that we are not yet sur
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Karl Newman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
>>
>> I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
>>
>> It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book wrote:
> I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
>
> It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus, but
> that we are not yet sure how to tag the fact that it
I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus, but
that we are not yet sure how to tag the fact that it is a national
forest, and not just any forest.
Adam Schreiber
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:56 AM, James Fee wrote:
> The problem is that they aren't the same. National Forests are Department
> of Agriculture and National Parks are Department of Interior. There is
> probably a smart way to tag them, but there definitely should be separation
> between National
The problem is that they aren't the same. National Forests are Department
of Agriculture and National Parks are Department of Interior. There is
probably a smart way to tag them, but there definitely should be separation
between National Parks and everything else.
--
James Fee
http://www.spatial
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM, James Fee wrote:
> I totally agree. National Forests are administered by the Agriculture
> Department (not the park service) and are managed lands for different uses
> (timber, livestock, wildlife) as well as recreation. They are probably
> closer (feel free to
I totally agree. National Forests are administered by the Agriculture
Department (not the park service) and are managed lands for different
uses (timber,
livestock, wildlife) as well as recreation. They are probably closer (feel
free to flame me on this) to BLM lands than National Parks. Nationa
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Nicholas Vetrovec wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Theodore Book wrote:
> >> Despite my taking a "local" approach, I do think it would be great if we
> >> could do a coordinated national upload of the NHD data, however.
>
> >I think it would definitely he
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Theodore Book wrote:
>> Despite my taking a "local" approach, I do think it would be great if we
>> could do a coordinated national upload of the NHD data, however.
>I think it would definitely help make the US OpenStreetMap look more
>professional to get as much
12 matches
Mail list logo
