On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 19:09 -0700, Russ Nelson wrote:
> I think we need to morph this over to a discussion of what, exactly,
> does the absence of tiger:reviewed=no mean? Does it mean one or all of:
>
>o I have travelled the entire length of the way. It is spatially
> correct.
>o I
On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russ Nelson
> wrote:
>
>> Okay, it's pretty clear that most people don't want this change
>> implemented.
>
> but it's still the right thing to do.
Yes and no. Further to Apo's point that tiger:reviewed isn't
On Apr 24, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
> if it's an option I wouldn't wast a second to write about the pro/con.
> why does anyone try to force users to do it?
> I have patched josm already but not every user knows how to do it.
Apollinaris came to Sarah's mapping party in the H
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Okay, it's pretty clear that most people don't want this change
> implemented.
but it's still the right thing to do.
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Apollinaris Schoell
wrote:
> . and when it was
> implemented send a not[e] with "blame me ..."
*chuckle*
fair point !
the commendable idea of option control is awkward to implement, since
this is a style setting in XML, not a java patch.
Does JOSM allow use
On Apr 25, 2009, at 3:34 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Does anybody object to this? If not, I'll look at inserting special
> case code which removes tiger:reviewed when the way or any node it
> solely includes is edited in any way.
>
> I'm also not in favor of automatic tag removing, for the sam
On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>
> have already done my customize version and removed it from the style
> file
Then what problem are you trying to solve with this discussion? You
seem to be the only person with negative feelings about this change.
I think that unl
Does anybody object to this? If not, I'll look at inserting special
case code which removes tiger:reviewed when the way or any node it
solely includes is edited in any way.
I'm also not in favor of automatic tag removing, for the same reason -
any change does not imply adequately fixed
8 matches
Mail list logo
