Perhaps I'm not a typical mapper, but I don't find the existence of
bulk
imported local data to have been particular inhibiting in my
activity level.
I don't believe there is any one thing as a "typical mapper". But I
certainly agree with you myself, and so do many others, as witnessed
b
> Please take a read of
> http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2009/11/10/the-pottery-
> club/
It started out as an interesting story, until I got to the
"outsiders". Outsiders?!?! You have GOT to be kidding me. Next are
we going to have a manhood contest about who has the longer,
On Dec 5, 2009, at 4:02, "David ``Smith''" wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Scott Atwood > wrote:
>> Offshore islets can probably be mapped via satellite imagery.
>
> It's common practice for providers of aerial/satellite imagery such as
> Yahoo to mask out actual coverage of oceans and
Judging by the wiki page, there are no current plans on importing NHD in
Colorado. The Colorado Headwaters have been uploaded.
James
On Saturday 05 December 2009 01:16:29 pm SteveC wrote:
> I was asked yesterday if/when the NHD would be imported around CO. Anyone
> know?
>
> Yours &c.
>
> St
I was asked yesterday if/when the NHD would be imported around CO. Anyone know?
Yours &c.
Steve
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Shaun it's simply not that clear cut, there are plenty of people in the US who
would never have gotten involved without TIGER. I met one yesterday and it was
the first thing he said.
On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Shaun McDonald wrote:
> Why oh why oh why do some people insist on wasting time try
>
> what i'm looking at is why a bunch of ways in the area around Horseheads &
> Elmira NY
> disappeared mid-November. here is one of the ways that vanished:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/13037976/history
>
> i see its last appearance is in this changeset:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Matthew Luehrmann <
matthew.luehrm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just as a note for those interested in mapping streams and rivers, "the
> riverbed and banks, up to the ordinary high water mark, are state land,
> held
> in trust for the public for navigation, fishing, and
I fully support keeping "access=*" simple, or at least, not making it
more complicated than it is. Closed roads and bridges, for whatever
reason*, should be tagged "access=no".
Of course, having additional info would be great. I suppose
"description=*" would be best for that, as it seems that ke
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Scott Atwood wrote:
> Offshore islets can probably be mapped via satellite imagery.
It's common practice for providers of aerial/satellite imagery such as
Yahoo to mask out actual coverage of oceans and large lakes with a
generic "ocean" texture that is meant to lo
On 5 Dec 2009, at 00:47, Scott Atwood wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Shaun McDonald
> wrote:
> Why oh why oh why do some people insist on wasting time trying to import
> loads of data?
>
> Please take a read of
> http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2009/11/10/the-pottery-c
11 matches
Mail list logo
