As far as the purpose of the group as distinct from this one, my hope for the
professional group would be to focus on sustainably maintaining data in
OpenStreetMap that meet non-OSM business needs.
I contribute to OSM somewhat casually. I map things I am familiar with. But as
an official
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
The US Census Feature Class Code has descriptions of most types types of
roads.
This would at least tie it to an existing US standard.
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/appendxe.asc
This designation
I'll bet it could be re-used at the OSM booth at the Where2.0 conference,
no?
SEJ
Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans. -Empedocles
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 22:10, Blars Blarson
openstreetmap-talk...@scd.debian.net wrote:
After SCALE, I wound up with the OSM sign. About
I'm in san Diego and can take it up if it's still in LA?
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:09, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll bet it could be re-used at the OSM booth at the Where2.0
conference, no?
SEJ
Wretches, utter wretches, keep your hands from beans. -Empedocles
On Wed,
At 2010-03-03 14:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:50 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
Well, it's going to look goofy on the map to have dotted green and blue
lines.
I agree. However, coincidentally, I drove part of US-101 north of Ventura,
CA this weekend
At 2010-03-03 15:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
Alan Mintz wrote:
How should one tag the name signs at the entrance to a national forest
(e.g.
http://sites.google.com/site/am909geo/osm-1/DSCS5938_small.jpg?attredirects=0d=1
)?
boundary=national_park is an error according to JOSM
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2010-03-03 15:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
Alan Mintz wrote:
How should one tag the name signs at the entrance to a national forest
(e.g.
On 4 Mar 2010, at 8:45 , Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2010-03-03 14:00, Paul Johnson wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:50 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
Well, it's going to look goofy on the map to have dotted green and blue
lines.
I agree. However, coincidentally, I drove part
On 4 Mar 2010, at 9:38 , McGuire, Matthew wrote:
I see three dimensions of road classification at play here.
1) System
2) Function
3) Observed Character
System is the easy one. That is the road system(s) that that the road belongs
to especially for signage, but also for road funding
So, aside from interstates (which it seems like everyone agrees should
be tagged as motorways?), should/could System be abstracted out of
road tagging definitions?
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Mar 2010, at 9:38 , McGuire, Matthew wrote:
I
At 2010-03-04 09:38, McGuire, Matthew wrote:
...
A road's Observed Character is what kind of road it appears to be to a
person on the road. For general purpose maps, using observed character to
classify the roads intends to match a person expectations to what they see
on the ground. Character
can't you just copy it in to your email? Not a lot of text after all.
On Mar 4, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
the minutes for tonight's conference call may be found here on google docs:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dc9fx534_2fk694xc3
richard
On 3/4/10 10:37 PM, SteveC wrote:
can't you just copy it in to your email? Not a lot of text after all.
well, yes, i can. if that's preferred in the future i can certainly do
that.
richard
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
I think so - better than the extra click.
We should do this in OSMF too, I don't think we do... Mike?
Yours c.
Steve
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 3/4/10 10:37 PM, SteveC wrote:
can't you just copy it in to your email? Not a lot of text after all.
well, yes, i
On 3/4/10 10:55 PM, SteveC wrote:
I think so - better than the extra click.
We should do this in OSMF too, I don't think we do... Mike?
in the future (for the time i'm secretary, which hopefully will end at
some point)
i'll do this -- a link and the text both. the minutes at the link may
didn't know this page exists.
Fully agreed this is the best way to do. It's not perfect and some deviations
will make sense here and there.
On 4 Mar 2010, at 15:37 , Kevin Samples wrote:
Hi,
I am a proponent of using the Highway Functional Classification System,
which Alan has described
16 matches
Mail list logo
