Very nice. I did not know about that convention. Will use in the future
for sure.
Zeke
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> According to the Key:source page on the wiki, an object can have
> multiple source tags. So if you go out and survey a TIGER road and
> discover that
On 06/13/2010 07:39 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> So if you are considering writing a bot that does
>
> for each node in mass
>
> if the node has only massgis attribution tags, and no others, delete
> the tags (because surely it's either pointless and should be garbage
> collected, or is
According to the Key:source page on the wiki, an object can have
multiple source tags. So if you go out and survey a TIGER road and
discover that the name is incorrect you could change the name and add
a "source:name=survey" tag. I guess this allows you to distinguish the
source of specific element
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> then I'd say that sounds good.
>
+1
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
The way I see it, any given feature may have many components to it's data.
With a road you've got the geometry, name, classification, surface, etc…. .
These components may all come from one source, or they make come from
several. If the road is unmodified since the TIGER import then the source
of
Josh Kraayenbrink writes:
> I have been thinking, possibly incorrectly, about attribution on data. The
> Tiger import was great, but as you all know, not perfectly accurate. I have
> been "reviewing" and almost all roads, ways, etc that have been imported in
> my area are now corrected. The prob
Lars Ahlzen writes:
> Linear features imported from MassGIS data have the appropriate source=
> and attribution= tags. That makes sense. However, each individual node
> has these identical tags as well, including nodes that have no other tags.
>
> For such nodes with no other tags, this seems re
7 matches
Mail list logo
