There will be a GeoBus call tonight at 8pm Eastern Time.
Part of the agenda for this evening will be discussing the new Community
Events and Mapping Party work group:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Working_Groups/Community_Events
The idea is to merge
This discussion, although amazingly lengthy is seeming useful. Someone
already explained that much of New England is different from most of the
United States in terms of not having unicorporated areas, and it might
help to explain details.
In Massachusetts, we have counties. Counties don't do
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/20/2010 03:14 PM, Anthony wrote:
Only in those 11 states, right?
I'm surprised admin level isn't already handled defined on a state by
state level.
Why treat it
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
Read the link you provided: In the remaining nine town or township
states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin), there is no
geographic overlapping of these two
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
So if we have whole-multiple-counties=5 (eg
NYC) county=6 township=7 city/town=8 then it would make sense
everywhere.
What would be an example of a township that would be at admin_level=7?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM,
This discussion seems to have ended. Is it time to play spot the
consensus yet?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 10/20/2010 03:47 PM, Anthony wrote:
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_civil_division
So far all (three) of the states I've checked fit fine with
admin_level=6 for county equivalent, and admin_level=8 for
municipality.
I’ve recorded what I’ve found at
On 10/20/2010 03:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Anthonyo...@inbox.org wrote:
At the very least it would be nice to have a table outlining exactly
what municipality or minor civil division means for each state.
Is there one somewhere already? Should I start one?
On 10/20/2010 03:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Anthonyo...@inbox.org wrote:
At the very least it would be nice to have a table outlining exactly
what municipality or minor civil division means for each state.
Is there one somewhere already? Should I start one?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
This discussion seems to have ended. Is it time to play spot the
consensus yet?
I've spotted the consensus. Stop your bickering. Either come to an
agreement about this tagging, or ignore each other, but absolutely
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
This discussion seems to have ended. Is it time to play spot the
consensus yet?
I've spotted the consensus. Stop your bickering. Either come to
I agree with Richard but I don't want to feed the trolls by responding
(which is the policy of several other mailing list readers I know).
On Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Richard but I don't want to feed the trolls by responding
(which is the policy of several other mailing list readers I know).
I'm not sure what the point of this thread was then. All I got from it was:
*If I ever
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah what the hell I'm sitting around at an airport with extra troll food...
Nathan, you said yourself that you only edit-warred because you were
trying to get the foundation's attention. I would call that trolling, yes.
I
Hi,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
This discussion seems to have ended. Is it time to play spot the
consensus yet?
We have discussed the issue and decided that:
1. We would prefer if both parties could behave like grown-ups, amicably
resolve the matter (or at least find a compromise that both can
+1
On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
I agree with Richard but I don't want to feed the trolls by responding (which
is the policy of several other mailing list readers I know).
On Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:37 PM,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
3. We will not be drawn into further discussion about this. Edit wars are
not an acceptable means of settling a dispute *even* if one is right.
What would have been the correct means of settling the dispute then? I
tried
I've spotted the consensus. Stop your bickering. Either come to an
agreement about this tagging, or ignore each other, but absolutely
stop picking on each other.
You and Frederick seem to be the only ones with that view who
contributed to this thread.
As Ian said, the rest of us just
i'm with Richard as well.
richard
On 10/21/10 5:16 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
I agree with Richard but I don't want to feed the trolls by responding
(which is the policy of several other mailing list readers I know).
On Oct 21, 2010 4:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
Hi,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
3. We will not be drawn into further discussion about this. Edit wars are
not an acceptable means of settling a dispute *even* if one is right.
What would have been the correct means of
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/20/2010 03:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
Can someone please turn off my need to constantly enter a capatcha
(User:User_5528)?
Is it because you’re adding external references? That always triggers a
CAPTCHA…
I can't be
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I suggest that you ignore Paul's tagging as long as he uses it in his
local area. If you can't manage to do that, maybe try a Yoga class. Cool
down. Paul's tagging sure is quirky but who knows, sometimes these quirky
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/21/2010 08:06 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Greg Troxelg...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
So if we have whole-multiple-counties=5 (eg
NYC) county=6 township=7 city/town=8 then it would make sense
23 matches
Mail list logo
