Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote: >> On 10/20/2010 03:14 PM, Anthony wrote: >>> >>> Only in those 11 states, right? >>> >>> I'm surprised admin level isn't already handled defined on a state by >>> state level. >> >> Why treat it differently depending on the state? > > Because states do things so differently that a one-size-fits-all > solution makes no sense.
I can see both points. So I think the challenge is to design a scheme that is consistent and can be simplified on a state-by-state basis to be appropriate for the state. So if we have whole-multiple-counties=5 (eg NYC) county=6 township=7 city/town=8 then it would make sense everywhere.
pgptTeKP8sz4m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
