On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 23:57 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
> It feels like we have been going around in circles on this for almost
> two years. I wrote this in March 2009.
I concur. Discussions here go round and round, with no decision being
reached. They die then come up a few years later.
Sound
It feels like we have been going around in circles on this for almost
two years. I wrote this in March 2009.
http://weait.com/content/badges-badges
Can we reset just a bit? Rather than jumping to an answer "The tags
shall be this!" can we look at what our ideal goals would be? So from
a superf
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Nathan Edgars II
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Val Kartchner
> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:17 -0400, Nathan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Nathan Edgars II
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:17 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Val Kartchner
>> >
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:17 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Val Kartchner
> wrote:
> >> > Sorry to disappoint, but the 17x17 example that you
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:17 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Val Kartchner wrote:
>> > Sorry to disappoint, but the 17x17 example that you gave is quite
>> > readable.
>> Not nearly as readable as a lone 7.
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:17 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> > Sorry to disappoint, but the 17x17 example that you gave is quite
> > readable.
> Not nearly as readable as a lone 7.
>
> > I've attached another 17x17 that is also readable. Sin
On 29 Oct 2010, at 9:05 , Peter Budny wrote:
>
> P.P.S. Why do I see so many route relations where a way has been added
> more than once, sometimes up to 5 times, with the same role? What is
> that supposed to mean?
typically an error. only use case where it makes sense is a bus route which
so
Andy Allan writes:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Peter Budny wrote:
>
>> That doesn't work; there are cases where it's ambiguous. If you look at
>> [1], US-278 runs along North Avenue (bottom) and Ponce de Leon Avenue
>> (top), connected by Monroe Drive (left) and Piedmont Avenue (right).
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> That's a good idea. Is there a list of preset or validation test suggestions
> out there already? Are there smaller-sized JOSM plugins that could be
> written?
I'd like a JOSM plugin that would expand US street name abbreviations, e.g.
NW -> Nor
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> That's a good idea. Is there a list of preset or validation test suggestions
> out there already? Are there smaller-sized JOSM plugins that could be
> written?
Things I'd propose:
A street suffix fixer based on MS Word's track/review that makes
That's a good idea. Is there a list of preset or validation test suggestions
out there already? Are there smaller-sized JOSM plugins that could be
written?
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> Perhaps creation of additional JOSM presets/validation tests and fixes?
>
> Cheers,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > At the Google Summer of Code mentors summit this past weekend Google
> asked
> > us (the organizations that participated in Summer of Code) to also
> > participate in th
Perhaps creation of additional JOSM presets/validation tests and fixes?
Cheers,
Adam
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> At the Google Summer of Code mentors summit this past weekend Google asked
>> us (th
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> At the Google Summer of Code mentors summit this past weekend Google asked
> us (the organizations that participated in Summer of Code) to also
> participate in the Google Code-In project. The Code-In project is similar to
> the Su
15 matches
Mail list logo