On 6/5/2011 12:22 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
however, there are unsigned routes in NY; state maintained routes which
have designations but which do not have signage, and some county
routes.
Three states - Florida, Alabama, and Tennessee - have an unsigned state
designation for every segment of U
On 6/5/11 12:15 AM, nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned.
The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a
new segment elsewhere.
Most Arkansas state highways and some US highways fall victim to this
On 6/5/2011 12:15 AM, nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned.
The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a
new segment elsewhere.
There are a lot of states that do this internally. But most sign th
In Arkansas, routes are not unsigned or (except in very rare cases) cosigned.
The route ends where it meets a route of higher priority and begins again as a
new segment elsewhere.
Most Arkansas state highways and some US highways fall victim to this splitting
at some point or another. What is a
Then what how how NC is *now* signing the "Future" Interstates?
http://www.duke.edu/~rmalme/i73seg10.html &
http://www.duke.edu/~rmalme/i73seg4.html#seg5 (search for "Photo of only I-73
sign along segment after its opening in December")
Those show the "Future" text in big bold text, but yes, t
On 6/4/2011 9:46 PM, James Mast wrote:
Also, are you going to try to add proper "Future" Interstate shields?
Currently in Google, they just show a normal Interstate shield. It might
give people a proper reason to tag these "posted" Future Interstate
correctly instead of without the "Future" tag.
Here's some examples you could test:
2 Interstates - I-77 & I-74:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/16776408 (Note: IMO, I think the refs
should be "I 77;I 74" instead since the mileage on this section is I-77's.)
2 Interstates + US Highway - I-73, I-74, & US-220:
http://www.openstreetm
On 6/4/2011 7:06 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Reminds me, we need to add some notation for unsigned routes in
relations (the only approaches I can think of are either to tag it as
roles on each member, with things like "unsigned;west" sometimes -
which is icky but would work - or having separate rel
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I'm doing a little work on shield rendering for Interstate and US
> Route shields, etc.
>
> Who has a favourite highway overlap? I'd like a few examples of each
> of the following.
> - two Interstates overlapping on a way
> - three Interstate
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I'm doing a little work on shield rendering for Interstate and US
> Route shields, etc.
>
> Who has a favourite highway overlap? I'd like a few examples of each
> of the following.
How about 1 interstate and 2 state routes?
http://www.opens
On 6/4/2011 4:51 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
I'm doing a little work on shield rendering for Interstate and US
Route shields, etc.
Who has a favourite highway overlap? I'd like a few examples of each
of the following.
- two Interstates overlapping on a way
I-80/90 across Indiana and Ohio
- thre
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> I'm doing a little work on shield rendering for Interstate and US
> Route shields, etc.
>
> Who has a favourite highway overlap? I'd like a few examples of each
> of the following.
> - two Interstates overlapping on a way
> - three Interstat
Oh why not. How about an overlap of one I, one US and one
state-something as well?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I'm doing a little work on shield rendering for Interstate and US
Route shields, etc.
Who has a favourite highway overlap? I'd like a few examples of each
of the following.
- two Interstates overlapping on a way
- three Interstates overlapping on a way
- combination of Interstates and US Routes t
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>> The point is that even if everyone has all the roads in their jurisdiction
>> memorized (and nowadays with consolidation and huge coverage areas that's
>> harder to do) and has previously spent t
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> I don't think people want to use this as a "this is your route and you must
> follow it". The idea would be that (a) dispatchers and emergency drivers
> could use the map and suggested route to give a better estimate on arrival
> time to first res
16 matches
Mail list logo
