On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
> I've been meaning to do some buffer analysis in my county to find
> roads that are missing or grossly misplaced [0]. Doing it for a county
> or for the whole US isn't that much different aside from computation
> time and disk usage. Of course this
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
> I believe that OSm's most usefull attribute is to be up to date.
>
> The only real way to do this is with a local mapper but bringing
> the USA up to Tiger 2011 up-to-datedness would be a great start.
>
>
> Are there tools to
>
> 1. Compar
On 1/14/2012 1:20 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
As you can see, the situation for highways / interstates is
particularly bad in SC / GA. I'd say that is a priority if you want to
help out.
I've not had any reply back from my 'Decliner'-contact in SC about a
public domain option. At this point,
3 matches
Mail list logo
