Hi all,
In doing the remap in LA, I've run across parks, some
schools and other map features that are marked with both points and
outlines. For La Cienega Park, the park is outlined, coded park
and named. There also is a point for La Cienega Park. My initial
impulse was to delete
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
In doing the remap in LA, I've run across parks, some schools
and other map features that are marked with both points and outlines.
For La Cienega Park, the park is outlined, coded park and
named. There also is a point for La Cienega
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com wrote:
Hi all,
In doing the remap in LA, I've run across parks, some schools and
other map features that are marked with both points and outlines. For La
Cienega Park, the park is outlined, coded park and named.
If there is a point and an area I keep the area and delete the point. If
the point has data I'd like to keep, as is often the case when I trace a
park on the map and want to use the name and other info from a GNIS point I
simply copy the attributes over. To easily copy the attributes over in
On 4/24/2012 2:38 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
Yes, there should be only one feature for each real world object, and
the way/multipolygon has more spatial information, however the nodes
might have other useful information like the GNIS feature ID.
For this matter, why are there county nodes all over
On 4/24/2012 10:21 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I think the reason they exist is the same reason why cities always
have a node in addition to their administrative boundaries. And
states/countries too far that matter. Most renderers render the name
from the nodes, not the admin boundaries.
This makes
6 matches
Mail list logo
