I currently have the opportunity to do some mapping in Columbus, Ohio.
The admin boundary for the city seems a bit odd:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/182706
There seem to be a lot of holes in the multipolygon relation, and it
seems strange to me that there are so many places withi
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II
> wrote:
>> I agree with this. But I'm not sure that there is a solution. You can use
>> XAPI/Overpass API to download only roads in an area, but you get conflicts
>> (or worse, you move a node and screw up something else without realizing it)
>>
>From a slightly different perspective, there are, in fact, many solutions,
each of which may be suboptimal in some respects. In any case, the
scalability issues arising as a result of data growth will need to be dealt
with.
Some benefits may be had looking for optimizations to apply to data
down
On 6/11/2012 7:17 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
On one hand, I share the frustration of having lots of new data in
an area making some of our tools slower and more difficult to use.
In my area a building footprint import slowed down most of the
mapping tools and land use polygons can get in the way of edi
On one hand, I share the frustration of having lots of new data in
an area making some of our tools slower and more difficult to use.
In my area a building footprint import slowed down most of the
mapping tools and land use polygons can get in the way of editing
roads.
On the other hand, I really
if anyone has it, would be apprecaited. Or, Ben, if you're out there,
please contact me offlist re NHD shapefiles.
Thanks in Advance
--
John Novak
585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetm
The OSM UK wiki has a priorities page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Mapping_Priorities); since a
similarly named page does not exist for the US (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Mapping_Priorities), we should create
one and begin populating it.
Best,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:15 A
I've just notice that the user "SD Mapman" has added in the ref tags several
hidden Interstates and removed what was originally in those tags (example:
ref=US 27 > ref=I 124). It seems he's done this for all of the hidden
Interstates.http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SD%20Mapman/edits?page=
On 6/11/2012 10:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Personally, I wish that all those that want to import building outlines
would first think about the existing street network (this, after all,
being OpenSTREETMap). So much of the US is still unedited TIGER 2005
data - mis-aligned, poorly connected, stale-n
There have been several threads about import guidelines and building
imports lately. Still, nobody is ever concerned with the data size and
performance issues that will surely be caused by expanded imports of
building and lot outlines (as discussed recently for Bakersfield,
California). Shouldn
10 matches
Mail list logo
