Re: [Talk-us] Special issues in LA remap

2012-06-13 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Steve All wrote: > I am performing very large hand-waving gestures when I totally > guess at what the components of the algorithm of the redaction > bot are or might eventually be. >From http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-June/000256.html: "Redaction bot is almost done. This

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread James Mast
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:53:11 -0400 > From: nice...@att.net > To: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM? > > On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote: > > > > Remove bing.attribution.xml from the c

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread James Mast
There seems to be something wrong in my profile, that's for sure. I just renamed the folder for JOSM in "C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming" to JOSM1 so that JOSM would create a new one and then started a new instance of JOSM and downloaded some OSM data. Then I loaded Bing in the background and the n

Re: [Talk-us] Special issues in LA remap

2012-06-13 Thread Steve All
At 2012-06-08 13:49, stevea wrote: I discern a vague remap plan ordering. If you can, please sharpen this up or correct it if it is outright wrong: 1) "The redaction bot" (still being written) will do much (to "ease in" the license change), Not sure what you mean by "ease in" here. It will

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread Mike N
On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote: Remove bing.attribution.xml from the cache dir: %APPDATA%\JOSM\cache\bing.attribution.xml on Windows ~/.josm/cache/bing.attribution.xml on Linux This appears to be a JOSM bug, as the attribution file/config should not be cached. https://josm.opens

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread Mike N
On 6/13/2012 2:09 PM, Mike N wrote: It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to different servers behind the load sharing server. OK, I'm officially stumped. I have 2 instances of JOSM - one 'works', and the other always shows the 'old imagery'. I removed all c

[Talk-us] Community & educational development

2012-06-13 Thread AP
PRESS RELEASE The American Grants and Loans Catalog is now available. Our new and revised 2012 edition contains more than 2800 financial programs, subsidies, scholarships, grants and loans offered by the US federal government. In addition you will also have access to over 2400 programs funded by

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread Mike N
On 6/13/2012 12:13 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom 20: It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to different servers behind the load sharing server. So that might be why some solutions work diffe

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote: I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM is still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer imagery. Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom 20: http://www.openstreetmap.

Re: [Talk-us] Special issues in LA remap

2012-06-13 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-06-08 13:49, stevea wrote: I discern a vague remap plan ordering. If you can, please sharpen this up or correct it if it is outright wrong: 1) "The redaction bot" (still being written) will do much (to "ease in" the license change), Not sure what you mean by "ease in" here. It will

Re: [Talk-us] Special issues in LA remap

2012-06-13 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-06-07 16:39, Mike N wrote: Using way id 13292685 : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/13292685 , I looked at the edits. In this case, some nodes were moved, presumably to align with the aerial imagery. I couldn't find any GPS tracks in the immediate area to confirm the aerial al

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread James Mast
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:46:37 -0400 > From: nice...@att.net > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM? > > On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote: > > I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM > > is still loading

Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread Mike N
On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote: I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM is still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer imagery. From a similar thread on talk... right-click on the editing area and select 'Flush tile cache'.

[Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?

2012-06-13 Thread James Mast
Does anybody know if the link that we should use for Bing has changed for JOSM? Only reason I'm asking is because Potlatch 2 and JOSM are right now showing totally different imagery in some areas. Here's an example:http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.81027&lon=-80.11468&zoom=16&layers=M If