[Talk-us] Good work with remapping!

2012-07-23 Thread Toby Murray
I've been watching edits come in today and I see good work being done on interstates, especially in the LA area. It isn't the most fun work to do so thanks to everyone who is pitching in. I ended up finishing the cleanup on I-105. It's just a short one so that's not really a huge feat. To make

Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?

2012-07-23 Thread Kevin Kenny
On 07/22/2012 09:33 PM, Paul Norman wrote: The mappings on the wiki are not only incomplete and inconsistent, they're for an older NHD version and sometimes clearly wrong. I posted a better one (http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-July/008502.html) earlier this month but it

Re: [Talk-us] National Map Corps Revived - And Using the OSM Stack

2012-07-23 Thread Eric Wolf
I'm probably not supposed to email you all but I hate seeing unanswered questions. We have official publications about the project: FactSheet: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs20113103 Phase 1: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr2036 An OFR on Phase 2 is due out any day now. Watch

Re: [Talk-us] National Park boundaries

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi, On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote: a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a boundary=national_park[3] around it with a name tag, so it would be a little easier to find. But it turns out the NPS has a boundary shapefile for

Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Norman
From: Kevin Kenny [mailto:kken...@nycap.rr.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 5:45 AM To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable? On 07/22/2012 09:33 PM, Paul Norman wrote: The mappings on the wiki are not only incomplete and

Re: [Talk-us] National Park boundaries

2012-07-23 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: boundary=national_historic_site boundary=national_historic_park boundary=national_forest[1] There are 37 classes in total, most of them with only a few instances. What do y'all think of that idea? Perhaps add a

[Talk-us] Bike infrastructure

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi all, I'm trying to complete local bicycle infrastructure here in and around Salt Lake City. I obtained GIS data (a shapefile) containing local bike infrastructure[1], and a lot of it is already in there. I do have a few questions: * Some streets are marked 'quiet streets'. This does not imply

Re: [Talk-us] National Map Corps Revived - And Using the OSM Stack

2012-07-23 Thread Mike Thompson
Eric, Thanks for the info. I might be mistaken, but I recall looking at the public crowd sourcing pilot. I noticed that a lot of edits submitted by the public were sourced from copyright or license restricted sources. There were comments from contributors like per Google or per yellowpages.com.

Re: [Talk-us] National Park boundaries

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: boundary=national_historic_site boundary=national_historic_park boundary=national_forest[1] There are 37 classes in total, most of them

Re: [Talk-us] NHD import: what data quality is acceptable?

2012-07-23 Thread Kevin Kenny
On 07/23/2012 10:49 AM, Paul Norman wrote: This unfortunately falls short. I find that you need to check the FCode across at least 3 different parts of the country to be sure. I've found there are regional variations in how FCodes are used. But I'm not *doing* 3 different parts of the country.

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Meetup in Metro Atlanta (Late Notice)

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
How did it go? I ran a meetup in Salt Lake[1] on Saturday and we had six people, two new to OSM. We talked about mapping priorities, the effects of the license change (we have a decliner in the area who has been very active in the past), and went out mapping downtown businesses. It was fun, and

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Meetup in Metro Atlanta (Late Notice)

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 7/23/2012 1:04 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: We talked about mapping priorities, the effects of the license change It's good to hear about your meetup group, and that it's growing. I'm very glad I won't have to try to

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Meetup in Metro Atlanta (Late Notice)

2012-07-23 Thread the Old Topo Depot
Martijn, What mapping devices/processes are used to gather and update OSM data ? Best, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 7/23/2012 1:04 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: We talked

Re: [Talk-us] National Park boundaries

2012-07-23 Thread Greg Troxel
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes: Hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: Perhaps add a us: prefix to the value? boundary=us:national_historic_site boundary=us:national_historic_park boundary=us:national_forest I like that idea, in spite of the

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Meetup in Metro Atlanta (Late Notice)

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
In a typical mapping party, I bring GPS devices and walking papers. The GPS devices are not so useful in urban areas, for two reasons: reduced accuracy because of buildings, and street network already in place. I use the traces exclusively to georeference images from my digital camera.

Re: [Talk-us] National Park boundaries

2012-07-23 Thread Kevin Kenny
On 07/23/2012 12:50 PM, Steven Johnson wrote: Martijn all, I rather like the samples you gave: boundary=national_historic_site boundary=national_historic_park etc. They are simple, straightforward, and unambiguous. (The pattern could also be extended to other boundary types.) In the Forest

Re: [Talk-us] National Map Corps Revived - And Using the OSM Stack

2012-07-23 Thread Eric Wolf
Mike et al, Here is my personal, educated view on the way volunteers working on the USGS prototype VGI system employed information from Google: The guidelines the USGS provides to contributors specifically states that Google is not an authoritative source, which is more of an issue than

Re: [Talk-us] OSM Meetup in Metro Atlanta (Late Notice)

2012-07-23 Thread Peter Dobratz
On 7/23/12, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Increasingly, I also explain the use of apps (OSMTracker, Vespucci) as most people bring a smartphone. iPhones are not so useful as there are not too many OSM specific data collection apps available (I remember iLOE but don't know if that's

Re: [Talk-us] National Map Corps Revived - And Using the OSM Stack

2012-07-23 Thread Mike N
On 7/23/2012 1:58 PM, Eric Wolf wrote: Interestingly, in Phase 2 there were some structures that got changed back to the initial state from GNIS. After a little digging, it was noted that the first volunteer fixed incorrect information from the GNIS import but then the second volunteer (during

Re: [Talk-us] Bike infrastructure

2012-07-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to complete local bicycle infrastructure here in and around Salt Lake City. I obtained GIS data (a shapefile) containing local bike infrastructure[1], and a lot of it is already in there. I do have a

Re: [Talk-us] Routing tests

2012-07-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi, On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote: I think this topic deserves its own thread. On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I have had a first stab at it. http://apmon.dev.openstreetmap.org/us_routing_grid.html I

Re: [Talk-us] Routing tests

2012-07-23 Thread the Old Topo Depot
That was me How does http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:JohnANovak/Interstates fit your requirements ? On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote: I think this topic