My only objection to network=US:US:Business / ref=80 is How do you
know it's Business-80 or 80-Business on the signs?
In essence here, we have the tension between free-format tagging and
machine-parsable and understandable tagging. Syntax and semantics. We
*definitely* don't need tagging with
Richard Welty writes:
however, there are vast areas (like most if not all of WV) where
the alignment of TIGER 2005 is really awful, and TIGER 2011/2012 is
a significant improvement. since the latter is available as an
image layer which i know works with JOSM and i understand works
with
On Oct 24, 2012, at 5:01 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
NE2 asked me to revert the changes, because he's unhappy with me moving the
route variant information from the ref tags to the modifier tags, e.g.
turning ref=80
Paul Johnson writes:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
My only objection to network=US:US:Business / ref=80 is How do you
know it's Business-80 or 80-Business on the signs?
Isn't that the argument in favor of network=US:US / ref=80 /
On 10/27/12 2:46 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
If the former, then it matters if it's Business-80 or 80-Business. If
the latter, then as long as we preserve the modifier, then we're good.
at this point, i think i've seen enough to know that what goes on the signs
can be a little bit unpredictable. on
Richard Welty writes:
On 10/27/12 2:46 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
If the former, then it matters if it's Business-80 or 80-Business. If
the latter, then as long as we preserve the modifier, then we're good.
at this point, i think i've seen enough to know that what goes on the signs
can be
I saw bsupnik's wiki page, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bsupnik, on
importing of NHD into OSM. I'm working on National Parks in Washington
State. After spending countless hours tracing in streams and rivers into
OSM, I've finally decided that importing makes more sense. I'm wondering
Past NHD imports have made vast multipolygons which can be difficult to
interpret without a view of the whole thing. This made particular problems
for tiles@home/osmarender, which tried to render the multipolygons without
loading their out-of-area members, leading to water-land inversion in a lot
On 10/27/2012 7:28 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Before I bring this up on the imports list, I thought I'd ask the US
community about their opinion about importing the data.
I agree that it is a good idea to import NHD. It is an asset when
doing surveys and updates: you can review it for any
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Past NHD imports have made vast multipolygons which can be difficult to
interpret without a view of the whole thing. This made particular problems
for tiles@home/osmarender, which tried to render the multipolygons
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 10/27/2012 7:28 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Before I bring this up on the imports list, I thought I'd ask the US
community about their opinion about importing the data.
I agree that it is a good idea to import NHD. It is an
On 10/27/2012 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On the other hand, I believe NHD should not be imported into US
OSM Edit deserts. It's best to wait until there is a community
who wants an NHD import. In the meantime, the NHD for that area
may be updated and when it is finally
Mike N writes:
For your case, since you are comparing it against existing data and
Bing imagery and possible consultation with Topo maps, it is entirely
appropriate to use NHD data. In effect, because of your interest, you
are the active mapper in the area, even though it is not all
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Mike N writes:
For your case, since you are comparing it against existing data and
Bing imagery and possible consultation with Topo maps, it is entirely
appropriate to use NHD data. In effect, because of your
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 6:19 PM
To: OSM US Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NHD Imports
I would like to have every stream in the U.S. available as a .osm file.
So, say, I am running along some road or railroad, and I see a stream
that
15 matches
Mail list logo
