On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> And I suspect that the
> UUID will be meaningful when trying to cross-reference back to the
> original data.
Are you confusing the UUID with gnis:feature_id ?
- Serge
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk
On 08/20/2013 04:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
In addition, I suggest that we remove two other tags conditionally.
I suggest we remove the "ele" tag unless the tag natural=peak is
present and that we remove "source" if the value for that tag is "USGS
Geonames" (which is just GNIS).penny stove
Hi Serge,
I am 100% OK, removing these tags.
Thanks
Jason.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
>
> As a step towards cleaning up the mess, I'd like to discuss removing
> some extranious gnis tags in the
I'd be more excited by a proposal to de-dupe GNIS data... but the tag
cleanup is basically OK.
It would be nice if the editors more loudly removed these tags. Silent is
bad. That said:
*Explicitly Preserve:* gnis:feature_id gnis:id
*Consider deprecating*: gnis:edited, gnis:Cell, gnis:review,
gnis
The elevation attached to a GNIS point is taken from the National Elevation
Dataset (NED) which has a 30 meter resolution in many cases (can be as high
a resolution as 1 meter and as low a resolution as 60 meters depending on
the location). This means that you don't get the highest elevation, only
go for it.
actually the ele tag is quite wrong on peaks and should be removed too
or renamed to something like estimated ele
On 8/20/2013 1:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
As a step towards cleaning up the mess, I'd like to dis
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
>
> As a step towards cleaning up the mess, I'd like to discuss removing
> some extranious gnis tags in the editors (just as we do with TIGER and
> other tags).
>
Hi all,
I've been looking at the GNIS data and it's quite a mess.
As a step towards cleaning up the mess, I'd like to discuss removing
some extranious gnis tags in the editors (just as we do with TIGER and
other tags).
I would like to suggest that the editors remove the following tags entirely:
8 matches
Mail list logo