I'm just curious, but what's everybody's opinion on this? I know it's
acceptable for the Interstates (some are setup this way, some aren't) since
they are all divided, but what about for US Highways and State Highways? I
know that we want to eventually have the cardinal directions in OSM for
On 11/17/13 10:30 AM, James Mast wrote:
Also, on a side note, do you guys think we should remove the symbol
tags in the relations from all the Interstates/US highways they show
up in at the same time?
not sure what i think about the relation splitting idea. but i do agree
that the
symbol tags
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
So there is a fairly new mapper in the Phoenix area removing valid data. I
would like advice on what to do. I don't to want dampen this mapper's
efforts. However, another mapper has complained to me about the problem
On 07:47 2013-11-17, Richard Welty wrote:
perhaps symbol can go on the list of tags that editors remove automagically.
I don't think it's a good idea to automatically remove symbol=. Even
though in the U.S. we've been using it mostly for URLs to Wikimedia
Commons images, the wiki [1]
On 11/17/2013 5:55 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea to automatically remove symbol=.
+1 - as a manually added tag, removing the tag would be destroying
hand-acquired data. And just because a known shield renderer doesn't
use it today, doesn't mean future renderers
5 matches
Mail list logo
