Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

Matijn, James, Like Saikrishna, I am in favor of using the colon or pipe symbol rather than the semi-colon, for reasons that Martijn originally outlined. However, Martijn then changed his mind, which to my thinking seems a pity. Is there any chance that you could be persuaded to change it back,

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

Martijn I just wrote a short novel on why I think we should use obviously different cardinal direction roles on single carriageway roads than on dual carriageway ways, and so I'll not repeat myself here. Peter On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: James,

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

Martijn, Roads like I 394 west of downtown Minneapolis have several miles of collector-distributor lanes (separate carriageways running parallel to the main motorway carriageways) in each direction whose purpose is to handle slower entering and leaving traffic without creating dangerous short

Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US State highways.

Martijn, While spending the last three weeks comparing different methods of defining cardinal directions in member roles, I noticed that iD makes it hard to see which direction on a way is currently OSM forward. Potlach makes it easy, once you grasp what the arrow shows. JOSM does it less