On 11:31 2014-01-12, Peter Davies wrote:
This is really helpful in confirming to me that I can't use relations in
my apps, as there are too many unfinished ones. Can anyone tell me if
they know of anyone else with such a spreadsheet for any other states?
Actually, road route relations are
Hey folks,
Our first Mappy Hour of 2014 is tonight at 5:30 PST / 8:30 EST.
The Event link on Google+ is
https://plus.google.com/events/csqquhngh6k52ctdkrftk3noic4
Let us know if there's anything in particular you want to talk about.
I would very much like to spend a little time talking about
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hey folks,
Our first Mappy Hour of 2014 is tonight at 5:30 PST / 8:30 EST.
The Event link on Google+ is
https://plus.google.com/events/csqquhngh6k52ctdkrftk3noic4
Let us know if there's anything in particular you want
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Peter Davies peter.dav...@crc-corp.comwrote:
We would post the cardinal directions using tags for each whole
directional relation. However where the Muskogee Turnpike turns from E-W to
S-N, or has some even more complex deal such as E +ve and N -ve, the
I've been maintaining a similar list of relations on the wiki for Kansas.
It is a bit tedious to keep up to date though and doesn't have all the
highways in the state listed yet.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kansas_state_highways#List_of_highways_and_their_status
Toby
On Mon, Jan 13,
Thanks, Mihh.
Actually I'm interested in any road on which significant traffic incidents
and slowdowns occur, including county roads and major named urban streets
(OSM primary, secondary, and maybe tertiary). I've not heard of anyone
planning to go down to those levels with route relations, but
Paul,
Good question. This discussion has become so complex now that we are all
in danger of losing the plot. Perhaps a summary of options will help reach
a breakthrough, or more likely leave us with all the options in use. :)
The goal is to capture cardinal directional posting (N, S, E, W) on
On 1/13/14, 8:42 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hey folks,
Our first Mappy Hour of 2014 is tonight at 5:30 PST / 8:30 EST.
The Event link on Google+ is
On 1/13/14 4:22 PM, Dave Oksner wrote:
I'd like to contribute more: specifically, speed limit info. I recently
stubled across a document put out by the county Public Works department
that summarizes all of the county traffic codes, including the speed
limits of all county-maintained roads,
Hello Dave:
In California, the California Public Records Act or CPRA (1) and
recent court cases (2, 3) make data published by our government
(public) entities consistent with OpenStreetMap's license. This went
all the way to the California Supreme Court and is established
statute, and so is
On 1/13/14 5:56 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 13, 2014 4:10 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
4) consider combining this project with the construction of county
route relations for your area if they're not already there.
I've been looking at what it's going to take to handle
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Peter Davies peter.dav...@crc-corp.comwrote:
I think it's time to start posting cardinal directions and destinations on
ramps, and neither relations method (methods #1 or #2) can offer this.
Currently US ramps are naked. They have no ref, no name, nothing to
US101 on the Cuesta Grade north of SLO needs checking. The maxspeed values on
US101 to the CA58 interchange and on CA58 east to CA33 I did recently on one of
my trips south. But I did not split US101 where I got off and so the values
south of that interchange on US101 are from my tagging to the
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 1/13/14 5:56 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 13, 2014 4:10 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
4) consider combining this project with the construction of county
route relations for your area if
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.uswrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you
find a problematic GNIS node (especially natural feature), you should
consider sending an email to gnis_mana...@usgs.gov as
15 matches
Mail list logo
