Toby,
Thanks for assisting.
The aeroway-related tags exist on way 321010352 because my initial focus was to
replicate the tags that existed on the ways that were accidentally deleted by
chachafish. I didn’t agree with said tagging, but I felt removing those tags
was for another changeset and d
I did a quick fix for the hole in the Denver, Denver County and Adams
county relations. I may take another look at the area tonight. I saw a few
oddities although I don't think they are related to your edit. I don't
think way 321010352 should have aeroway tags on it since it is a member of
a relati
+1 for not having statistical boundaries in OSM.
My objection is along the lines of what has been said about the boundaries
changing. Once changed, who then takes responsibility to make it right? If
there is a lack of integrity at least in my experience I would look for more
credible sources.
Hi, Thanks for the comments. I do realize there are problems with some of
my earlier imports. My intentions were good but as with many inexperienced
mappers the execution wasn't what it could have been. There are many things
I wouldn't do now as I have gained more experience. Since those early
impo
Kristen,
If nobody else takes this on, I can look at it this weekend.
--
Jim
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Kam, Kristen wrote:
> Good Morning OSMers,
>
> A Telenav data integrity check picked up geometry issues associated with
> the Denver International Airport Route relation. We found that
+1 to not having statistical boundaries in OSM.
Even actual legal administrative boundaries change as there are
annexations, detachments, mergers, improved accuracy, etc., so what's in
OSM (or from the Census) should be used with that in mind too.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Harald Kliems wr
On Fri Jan 09 2015 at 9:41:21 AM Richard Welty
wrote:
>
> i think CDP boundaries are very clear cut, but they morph
> frequently, have no legal standing, and don't necessarily
> correspond to what local residents think.
>
... and there is no way to verify them on the ground. Yes, this is true for
On 1/9/15 2:32 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Taginfo currently shows over 2,000 instances of boundary=census, both
for CDPs and for statistical boundaries in other countries. [1]
I use boundary=census. If it weren't already in such wide use, I
would've gone with the more generic-sounding boundary=s
Recently I've been trying to improve the distribution of place=village
versus place=town in my area. Originally municipalities were tagged
based on their populations, resulting in clusters of place=cities in
urban and suburban areas and a desert of place=hamlets everywhere else.
And there's a l
Dear Nathan,
I've accidentally come across some of your imports in the Fresno area
and found that they had many problems - just the usual import stuff
really, over-noding, mapping individual building plots as residential
areas, over-tagging, landuse areas matching neither the aerial imagery
nor
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ l
11 matches
Mail list logo
