OK
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
On 3/23/15 8:32 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing over
who's gonna be running it from recording.
i think only Martijn can add managers. i'll try
On 3/23/15 8:32 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing
over who's gonna be running it from recording.
i think only Martijn can add managers. i'll try wrestling with
event interface again in a little bit.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing over
who's gonna be running it from recording.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
On 3/23/15 4:14 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things
On 3/23/15 4:14 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things up?
i was a little mystified by the current G+ interface so i didn't do so.
if you can figure it out, more power to you.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS IT
Greg,
3. It is my belief and experience that the ground observable rule is
something that only applies to Europe or older metropolitan areas.
I think there's a misunderstanding here.
Of course even in European metropolitan areas there will *not* be a sign
bearing the name of every stream that
Greg Morgan wrote:
2. To quote Richard Fairhurst, Seriously, OSM in the [England] s still
way beyond broken. You can open it at any random location and the map
is just __fictional__. Here are two random examples bing;OS StreetView
[2] shape is approximate. Needs proper survey as mostly
here is an event link which i hope works ok:
https://plus.google.com/b/113331273824393211883/events/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0?authkey=COK7xau86urZ6gE
i may need to send invitations to people on a case by case basis;
if you have a g+ account but can't get access, send me an email
and i'll try
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Every time this boundary debate or accuracy debate comes up, I image that
I am supposed to have $20,000 of GPS equipment[1]; post process the data so
that it is accurate; before I dare put the data in OSM.
I agree
I agree 100% with Bryce.
- Serge
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
The nice thing about mapping a neighborhood name as a point feature is:
a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly
Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things up?
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
in the traditional 8:30pm ET slot - Martijn is traveling so i get
to pick the time.
i'll post a link here when i have it.
richard
--
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
wrote:
tl;dr: I'm against a blanket rule when it comes to administrative
boundaries. They're really nuanced, and so should we.
On 2015-03-22 04:32, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Imagine if Bob and Alice conflict on where a
The nice thing about mapping a neighborhood name as a point feature is:
a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly fuzzy,
boundaries.
For 10% of the hassle you map 90% of the benefit.
___
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
wrote:
The nice thing about mapping a neighborhood name as a point feature is:
a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly fuzzy,
boundaries.
For 10% of the
this should be it:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thank you Richard! That was fun. We had a good turnout today. I hope to see
you all in a couple of weeks.
Martijn
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
this should be it:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0
--
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
Except when it reports you are in a different neighborhood than you
actually are.
A point feature does not imply a radius.
A governmental defined neighborhood boundary is totally mappable at the
right admin level,
16 matches
Mail list logo
