On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Clifford Snow
wrote:
> Except when it reports you are in a different neighborhood than you
> actually are.
>
A point feature does not imply a radius.
A governmental defined neighborhood boundary is totally mappable at the
right admin level, and you would
not ne
Thank you Richard! That was fun. We had a good turnout today. I hope to see
you all in a couple of weeks.
Martijn
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Richard Welty
wrote:
> this should be it:
>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0
>
> --
> rwe...@averillpark.net
>
this should be it:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/event/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Bryce Nesbitt
wrote:
> The nice thing about mapping a "neighborhood name" as a point feature is:
>
> a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
> b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly fuzzy,
> boundaries.
>
> For 10% of the hassle you map
I agree 100% with Bryce.
- Serge
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> The nice thing about mapping a "neighborhood name" as a point feature is:
>
> a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
> b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly fuzzy,
> boundaries.
The nice thing about mapping a "neighborhood name" as a point feature is:
a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly fuzzy,
boundaries.
For 10% of the hassle you map 90% of the benefit.
___
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
>
> 1. Every time this boundary debate or accuracy debate comes up, I image that
> I am supposed to have $20,000 of GPS equipment[1]; post process the data so
> that it is accurate; before I dare put the data in OSM.
I agree with you that things
here is an event link which i hope works ok:
https://plus.google.com/b/113331273824393211883/events/cnsbqt4rtjjcekl2hcgc53josj0?authkey=COK7xau86urZ6gE
i may need to send invitations to people on a case by case basis;
if you have a g+ account but can't get access, send me an email
and i'll try to
OK
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Richard Welty
wrote:
> On 3/23/15 8:32 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing over
> who's gonna be running it from recording.
>
> i think only Martijn can add managers. i'll try wrestling with
> event
On 3/23/15 8:32 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing
> over who's gonna be running it from recording.
>
i think only Martijn can add managers. i'll try wrestling with
event interface again in a little bit.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
I may need access to the US chapter page to do it without screwing over
who's gonna be running it from recording.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Richard Welty
wrote:
> On 3/23/15 4:14 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things up?
>
> i was a littl
On 3/23/15 4:14 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things up?
>
i was a little mystified by the current G+ interface so i didn't do so.
if you can figure it out, more power to you.
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Co
Greg Morgan wrote:
> 2. To quote Richard Fairhurst, "Seriously, OSM in the [England] s still
> way beyond broken. You can open it at any random location and the map
> is just __fictional__. Here are two random examples "bing;OS StreetView"
> [2] "shape is approximate. Needs proper survey as mo
Should I make the G+ event for it or will that trip things up?
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Richard Welty
wrote:
> in the traditional 8:30pm ET slot - Martijn is traveling so i get
> to pick the time.
>
> i'll post a link here when i have it.
>
> richard
>
> --
> rwe...@averillpark.net
> Av
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Greg Morgan
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for another TIGER tool. I used it to look at some areas and made
>> changes. The map reminds me of another map that MapBox produced several
>> years ago using a slider tool.
Greg,
> 3. It is my belief and experience that the "ground observable rule" is
> something that only applies to Europe or older metropolitan areas.
I think there's a misunderstanding here.
Of course even in European metropolitan areas there will *not* be a sign
bearing the name of every stream t
16 matches
Mail list logo
