Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Greg Morgan
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:13 PM, arch_a...@t-online.de arch_a...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, I've detected a user who damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City. I've tried to contact the user but I got no reaction. I've told the mapper that iD editor is inappropriate, as it has no

Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote: The last thing that I would want to do is involve the Data Working Group. I'm sending this mail as a DWG member- but I'm only speaking for myself, and not on behalf of the DWG. I don't think most people realize that

Re: [Talk-us] Elevation in local units

2015-03-26 Thread Lars Ahlzen
On 03/25/2015 01:43 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: * I feel that osm convention should encourage all mappers to specify units (e.g. 22 m). * That whitespace should be allowed (e.g. 22m, 22 m, or even 22 meters). * And that local units should be encouraged (e.g. 22 feet, or 22' 0). The wiki

Re: [Talk-us] user damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City

2015-03-26 Thread Minh Nguyen
arch_arch@... arch_arch@... writes: I've detected a user who damages administrative boundaries around Rapid City. I've tried to contact the user but I got no reaction. I've told the mapper that iD editor is inappropriate, as it has no built in validator but he didn't stop the edits. I want

Re: [Talk-us] Elevation in local units

2015-03-26 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com wrote: By the way, I thought that the wiki page for ele *used* to say that other units than m were acceptable (if explicitly specified) but I may be confusing it with something else, like width? FYI: There's a wiki template that