Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

No problem, had to do some searching and further remembering. The ‘agreement’ we were using was called the ‘tri-county waiver’ which allowed Boulder, Grand and Larimer county residents to pass through for work (it has changed a bit according to a search). However, there is also: http://www.nps

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

Russ, Thanks for the additional information. Perhaps hgv=destination? I am pretty sure that if one showed up at one of the Estes Park entrances with a semi and told them that you had to make a delivery in Granby they wouldn't let you through. The next time I am up there I will ask. Mike On Mon,

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

Dang, sorry; just caught my typo, hgv=private may NOT be the proper tag. From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:02 PM To: 'Mike Thompson' Cc: 'Open Street Map Talk-US' Subject: RE: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park Hi again Mike,

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

Hi again Mike, I should have specified – the entirety of Trail Ridge Road J I think we did actually come in (from the east, i.e. FC to Granby) via 36. I would say hgv=private is the ‘correct’ tag; in this case the ‘highway’ is actually ‘State controlled w/ agreements of the Park Service’, ma

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

Russ, Thanks for the helpful information. I should have mentioned it is US 36 in question (I haven't looked at US 34 yet - east of Deer Junction anyway). In any event, it sounds like you had special permission (since you didn't have to pay an entrance fee at all). In which case hgv=private (Only

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

It sounds like someone interpreted hgv=designated as "heavy goods vehicles are mentioned", rather than "this is the designated road for heavy goods vehicles to use". -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out ha

Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

Mike, Highway 34 has a bit different rules, I remember when I was living in Fort Collins and working in Granby we could pass through the park for free and actually drove our ‘commercial pickup trucks and wood chippers in tow’ (which is a whole other story with potential tree pest/disease sp

[Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park

I am finding roads in Rocky Mountain National Park tagged as "hgv=designated" in spite of the fact that on the ground it is clearly posted "No Commercial Vehicles in RMNP." While hgv doesn't exactly equal "commercial" it would be improper to route a commercial vehicle through the park. Can this t

Re: [Talk-us] ​Mapping Southern Maryland: A new local group

On Saturday, June 27, 2015 04:28:26 PM T M wrote: > Did you contact Univ of MD Eastern Shore? If not I can put you in contact > with their GIS professor? I haven't, mostly because it's outside of our intended geographic area of interest*, but I certainly wouldn't be against it. One of the people

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

Sorry about that, should of been more specific. I meant the archeological site. On Jun 29, 2015 2:24 PM, "Clifford Snow" wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Richard Welty > wrote: > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site >> > > Thanks for pointing out th

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site > Thanks for pointing out the wiki page on archaeological sites. I wasn't aware it was documented. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

On 6/29/15 4:58 PM, Brad Neuhauser wrote: > I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395 > ah, missed that. depends on whether the requirements of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site are met; if they are, then OSM is correct. otherwise

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Brad Neuhauser wrote: > I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395 > That was the feature I pick up on and did look any further. -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

I think there's also this? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303225395 On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 6/29/15 3:58 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the > > image it doesn't appear that the site has any historic

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

On 6/29/15 3:58 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the > image it doesn't appear that the site has any historical markers that > can be mapped. If so, I would say it doesn't belong in OSM. You'l' > have to ask OHM if they think it belongs there

Re: [Talk-us] Question?

Is there any feature on the ground that can be surveyed? From the image it doesn't appear that the site has any historical markers that can be mapped. If so, I would say it doesn't belong in OSM. You'l' have to ask OHM if they think it belongs there. You should also contact the editor. I'm sure s

[Talk-us] Question?

Would this be better in OpenHistoricalMap? http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/33.44692/-112.09043 *Regards,* *Hans* *http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 * *Sorry for any misspellings* __

[Talk-us] Telenav seeks OSM editors

Hey all, Apologies for the plug but I just can’t think of a better place to ask. Telenav currently has a couple open positions for OSM editors at our HQ in Sunnyvale, California! Here is the link to the job description, you can apply directly from there - http://t.co/k1xURXw4r9 If you want to