Re: [Talk-us] Request revert on Changeset #33669446

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: > I believe that as long as there is at least a solid barrier between > opposing traffic and access is limited to slip/link/ramp ways then that > section is classified as a freeway by CalTrans. Actually, just the latter.

[Talk-us] understanding administrative boundary relations

Hello - I am on a quest to learn more about how administrative boundaries can be managed as relations. I have a bit of experience with these things, but I am discovering the limitations of my knowledge also. Which was the point, actually. I would like to be able to suggest that governmental

Re: [Talk-us] understanding administrative boundary relations

The area you linked to has no boundary data in OSM. You don't state this in your email but by pulling up the TIGER shapefile, it looks like you are wanting school district boundaries? I see one runs through the area you linked to, in the shapefile. School districts were not imported into OSM. The

[Talk-us] Anybody had any contact with this user?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sarr_Cat Has anybody had any contact with that user and have him respond back? I don't think many of his edits are troublesome, but I've sent him two messages in the last 2 months without any response back from him, asking him if he could please add a

Re: [Talk-us] Anybody had any contact with this user?

Wow, that is more changesets than I racked up in 10 years. Haven't had contact with this particular mapper but I can say with certainty that they're not with Telenav. Martijn van Exel Secretary, US Chapter OpenStreetMap http://openstreetmap.us/ http://osm.org/ skype: mvexel On Thu, Sep 3, 2015

Re: [Talk-us] understanding administrative boundary relations

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote: > It has occurred to me that there will probably need to be a "boundary > watcher" tool, which can let an interested group know about it when a > boundary gets broken in some way. And I have started playing with the > python

Re: [Talk-us] understanding administrative boundary relations

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:51:50 -0500 Toby Murray wrote: > The area you linked to has no boundary data in OSM. You don't state > this in your email but by pulling up the TIGER shapefile, it looks > like you are wanting school district boundaries? I see one runs > through the

[Talk-us] Strategy for 'updated' TIGER regions

There have been analysis and strategy about fixing TIGER 'Deserts'[1], but what is the best way to manage regions that have been thoroughly updated to match TIGER, and possibly enhanced beyond that with local knowledge? Background - An essential task in keeping OSM updated and relevant in