Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

We could easily do a MapRoulette challenge to go through them systematically? On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:25 PM Minh Nguyen wrote: > Marc Gemis writes: > > > > > > > They can be mapped, especially the long ones and tagged as > highway=service,

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

Is this what we're after? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bIQ (I chose Kansas to annoy Toby) On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > We could easily do a MapRoulette challenge to go through them > systematically? > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:25 PM Minh

Re: [Talk-us] Cycle_greenway

Harald Klems writes: I would map greenways/bike boulevards as lcn=yes or, if they have a name, maybe as a lcn route relation. Other than that, I think it's more important to map physical characteristics such as stop signs, bike-specific infrastructure, diverters, and speed limits on those

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

On Sep 28, 2015 11:57 AM, "Eric Ladner" wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:44 PM Hans De Kryger wrote: >> >> I've always hated when someone maps driveways in residential area's. But that's just my opinion. Everyone has their opinion on what

Re: [Talk-us] Should driveways be on OSM?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > In urban areas, it makes no sense to try to map residential driveways I disagree. There's situations where this information is useful for finding the best way to a property, particularly on narrow blocks where a

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

Jack Burke writes: > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. -jack On September 29, 2015 5:10:25 PM EDT, Ray Kiddy wrote: > >I

[Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

I have been fixing up boundaries of cities in California and I have found something odd. Where is the city of Sacramento? There is a city there. There is a county. The county boundaries are at http://openstreetmap.org/relation/396460 and that all looks good. And it is not a county/city hybrid

[Talk-us] Consider running for the OSM US board? Join the October 1st campfire chat!

*RSVP for an October 1st campfire chat with active board members* to learn more about activities of the organization and responsibilities of the board: https://docs.google.com/a/openstreetmap.us/forms/d/1s7H_jnL6SBRGcico33nqCM0ZQmVCDu5WyaadluwV6u4/viewform Background: *October 12-18th are

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

I just like the surprise way in which the issue was resolved. Good work all around! -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Minh Nguyen