OK, 'residential' if it looks like 'subdivision', 'unclassified'
otherwise (as long as it's drivable in, say, my daughter's car rather
than my 4-wheeler). Got it.
I suspect that 'residential'/'unclassified' right now is almost a
difference without a distinction. I suppose that 'residential' might
On 6/3/16 5:13 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Can someone review for me the 'rural residential' problem?
the short version is that we are supposed to use residential
in truly residential areas and unclassified for generic town
roads. in tiger, there is no distinction between the two and so
everything was
I typically correct the geometry and delete the 'TIGER:reviewed=no', but
leave the rest because I'm superstitious...
-- SEJ
-- twitter: @geomantic
-- skype: sejohnson8
A serious and good philosophical work could be written consisting entirely
of jokes. --*Ludwig Wittgenstein*
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016
Hi Kevin, I'll try to add some context. Here's a neat use for the new OSM
Analytics tool developed by HOT:
http://osm-analytics.org/#/compare/polygon:~lwbS}lpoFipQYwJawGbnQxD/2008...now/highways
If you don't see 'blue' roads, zoom in until you do and then swipe left/right -
you can see the o
Can someone review for me the 'rural residential' problem?
I haven't done a lot of editing away of TIGER tags, although I've
wanted to - a lot of the areas where I've been mapping have had
virtually no TIGER review whatsoever and the garish overlays in JOSM
are annoying. Some of the areas I work o
* Alan Bragg [160603 21:30]:
> [..]
> Is there any other resource? Maybe some links to well tagged areas.
I have almost finished reviewing the part of Stillwater County, MT
south of the Yellowstone River (residential roads in Absarokee are not
finished yet, and also a little bit of Reed Point).
On Sat, 28 May 2016 06:51:52 wrote:
> Hello,
> I downloaded the maps, but they changed over night, so the md5 sums
> don't match up. I tried using rsync -cav to ftp.spline.de, but the
> connection times out "[Receiver] io timeout after 181 seconds --
> exiting" (return code 30) I know that the por
I've tried to fix TIGER roads near Show Low AZ
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/34.3565/-109.7752
where my daughter has a cabin.
I could not reach her cabin in my high clearance van so I called it a
highway=track.
The best roads appear smudgy black because they've been covered with
volcani
JOSM does automatically discard some TIGER:* tags. There's a list of keys
in the tags.discardable JOSM preference item. Among the list of tags that
JOSM automatically deletes are:
tiger:source
tiger:separated
tiger:tlid
tiger:upload_uuid
These tags are hidden from the editor so you don't normall
Yes, ok – so ‘aging myself’ a bit – but I did all my locale TIGER cleanup with
P2, so my practice was to review/almost always fix geometry, then look at
‘function’/classification of the roadway, then just delete the reviewed tag and
automagically those uid tags and such would go away. So it seem
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:52 AM Steve Friedl wrote:
> Ø Unless something changed, I think both Potlatch and JOSM will remove
> the ‘junk’ tags from TIGER if you delete the reviewed=no
>
>
>
> I’ve deleted thousands of tiger:reviewed tags (after proper review) and
> have never seen JOSM take anyt
Hello all in and near LA,
Work continues on the LA County Building
Import (more than 3 million buildings in LA
County) Sunday, June 5, at a mapathon in downtown LA.
We will be checking the imported
building outlines against aerial imagery to
validate this import, one of the la
* Unless something changed, I think both Potlatch and JOSM will remove the
‘junk’ tags from TIGER if you delete the reviewed=no
I’ve deleted thousands of tiger:reviewed tags (after proper review) and have
never seen JOSM take anything else along for the ride. JOSM *does* remove the
yellow
Oops, sorry Adam, replied directly to you versus the list; here’s the message:
My thoughts:
Unless something changed, I think both Potlatch and JOSM will remove the ‘junk’
tags from TIGER if you delete the reviewed=no. Maybe this is not the case with
iD?
As far as classification; ple
Just some more feedback on the idea of a TIGER rural-residential challenge
based on cleanup I've done throughout much of Vermont:
- Most of the roads in rural areas should have their highway= changed to
something other than residential. (well known issue).
- Surface tags would be GREAT!
Funny, I just looked at the MapRoulette beta and noticed that you were
already doing this.
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 10:00 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> Minor suggestion for this MapRoulette challenge: Could you structure
> it by state (or other geographic region, county?) and do each region
> s
Minor suggestion for this MapRoulette challenge: Could you structure
it by state (or other geographic region, county?) and do each region
sequentially. I, personally, think it would be neat to see areas get
"done" as far as Tiger clean up.
Either way, thanks for these.
James
On Fri, 2016-06-
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #306, is now available online in
English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
OpenStreetMap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/7593
*Among others:*
- Love Mapillary? Read in more for detailed article about using
Mapillary f
Well said. I have space in my basement also.
I am eager to launch a MapRoulette challenge for untouched rural ‘residential’
roads - a challenge which will probably take some time to complete. If someone
can furnish a good Overpass query for this, please go ahead and do it.
Martijn
> On Jun 3,
19 matches
Mail list logo