Re: [Talk-us] Center Turn Lanes/Auxiliary Lanes

2016-12-05 Thread Elliott Plack
There is a proposed tag for lanes:both_ways=* that I use for those. The handy JOSM Turn Lanes plugin supports this, which you can see in the second screencap on their repo . Mapbox

[Talk-us] Center Turn Lanes/Auxiliary Lanes

2016-12-05 Thread Spencer Gardner
I've been researching the way auxiliary lanes (right/left turn, etc.) are tagged in OSM but I can't tell if there's an accepted standard for handling these. There are a number of competing proposals for different scenarios and nothing seems to cover all cases.

Re: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

2016-12-05 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
Thanks, Paul, that's a big task. OSM (and I) appreciate it. SteveA California > On Dec 5, 2016, at 4:00 AM, talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Send Talk-us mailing list submissions to > talk-us@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Re: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

2016-12-05 Thread Volker Schmidt
> > > I will clarify that I do feel a little bad about this only because there's > no editors that handle two-way relations that end on a dual carriageway > cleanly, thus being the primary driver for this change. > I have come that the conclusion from a different angle. I and many others have

Re: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

2016-12-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > > > Just a heads up, I'm noticing the relation for USBR 66 in Oklahoma is darn >> near unmaintainable due to the sheer size of it, and I'm taking action now >> to prevent the problem from getting far worse in the

Re: [Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

2016-12-05 Thread Volker Schmidt
Just a heads up, I'm noticing the relation for USBR 66 in Oklahoma is darn > near unmaintainable due to the sheer size of it, and I'm taking action now > to prevent the problem from getting far worse in the future. > > The fact that the west end of the relation ends on a dual carriageway > leading

[Talk-us] USBR 66 in Oklahoma

2016-12-05 Thread Paul Johnson
Just a heads up, I'm noticing the relation for USBR 66 in Oklahoma is darn near unmaintainable due to the sheer size of it, and I'm taking action now to prevent the problem from getting far worse in the future. The fact that the west end of the relation ends on a dual carriageway leading into