Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Brian May
On 7/26/2017 4:05 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: 2. contact state GIS agencies for permission, if the website does not make license clear I have contact information, which I'm not going to share here. A template for the

Re: [Talk-us] Pittsburgh neighborhood boundaries mapped with admin level 9?

2017-07-26 Thread Bill Ricker
IDK Pittsburgh but City of Boston has semiofficial neighborhoods that sort of qualify as subordinate administrative units, in that there are official city hall neighborhood service offices and official borders. OTOH some of our official neighborhoods are 10x or more large than others (in both pop

[Talk-us] Pittsburgh neighborhood boundaries mapped with admin level 9?

2017-07-26 Thread Albert Pundt
I noticed that the neighborhoods in Pittsburgh are mapped as administrative boundaries with admin_level=9. Is this proper? The wiki page for U.S. admin levels doesn't list any use for admin level 9 in Pennsylvania, though this seems

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > I'm really glad that Bryan brought this up and that you responded asking for > less technical instructions. I think that finding local imagery sources like > this is a really great use of people's time and is something that

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Ian Dees
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > The CONTRIBUTING.md file presumes familiarity with GeoJSON, with the > specific schema in use to describe the map layers, and with a lot of > subtleties that may be obvious to someone accustomed to maintaining > the

[Talk-us] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
Oops, sent the following from the wrong return address, so the 'reply to the list' didn't happen. -- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Kenny Date: Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: > What can you do to help? > > We collect this imagery data here: > https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index > > Once it is added to the editor layer index, it will be available in iD and > other editors. This plea

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Bryan Housel wrote: > Hey this is a topic that I care about - It turns out, you are already > chipping in some money for high resolution orthoimagery! > > OK state Geographic Information Council > http://okmaps.onenet.net/index.html > > OK

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Decline in accuracy of capture date metadata in Bing imagery

2017-07-26 Thread Bryan Housel
Hey this is a topic that I care about - It turns out, you are already chipping in some money for high resolution orthoimagery! OK state Geographic Information Council http://okmaps.onenet.net/index.html OK state GIS Portal: