On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Okay folks. Coming back from not even 48 hours camping and this thread has
> exploded. I don't think it benefits anyone to continue in this way.
> Valuable insights get lost in the sheer volume of email; arguments are
> being repeated.
>
If you look across a large area of the Maryland, for example around here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.11882/-76.62031
You may notice a few very odd things.
1. Back in 2015, user 'gdoyle' created a large number of buildings,
using small, incorrect geometry.
2. This week, user 'annapo
More at:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005181.html
At the moment they are blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1587
It can be hard to say if the node only changesets are broken. JOSM
will split changes up like that when they exceed the API limit (1
We actually switched to zoom (zoom.us) because it is easier for folks to
just dial in if they prefer that. I'll send details closer to the date.
We usually plan them so that it's after work hours for most (5:30pm PT -
8:30pm ET) but open to other preferences.
Martijn
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:18
Hello, all,
Clifford makes some very good points. In the West, particularly,
those little intermittent streams are important landmarks. Particularly
when hiking in a featureless area, such as pinyon-juniper forest, a
trail direction may say something like, "turn right after crossing the t
Echoing (+1-ing) what Charlotte (and Clifford) said: waterway=creek on a
downward-flowing way (and an intermittent=yes tag, if true) are extensively
used and helpful, certainly where I am. While hiking, they are relatively
unambiguous wayfinding attributes, especially when/as they are
numbere
Hi,
* Charlotte Wolter [171016 23:50]:
> Clifford makes some very good points. In the West, particularly,
> those little intermittent streams are important landmarks. Particularly
> when hiking in a featureless area, such as pinyon-juniper forest, a
> trail direction may say something li
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Wolfgang Zenker
wrote:
>
> the problem here is that at least those NHD imports I have seen in
> Montana have only some of the existing streams. I don't know if this is
> because NHD does not have more or because the import used not all
> available streams. "Existi
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Clifford Snow
wrote:
>
>
>>
> Unnamed streams are helpful to people hiking in the forest areas by giving
> a landmark for navigation. From areas I'm familiar with, there are
> thousands of unnamed streams. They are unnamed because civilization just
> hasn't reache
9 matches
Mail list logo
