Thank you Bradley, Mike and brad for the fascinating insights, clarifications
and continuing discussion. I did not realize that this sort of boundary /
ownership / administration / distinctions with private inholdings was anywhere
near this complex: that "Congressional Boundary" thing I find
I've been struggling with this for roads. Unfortunately on the ground
survey is the best. There are a few cases where property owners have
put up illegal, or very misleading signs. The motor vehicle use map
(MVUM) is helpful, but usually not accurate outside NF boundary, but
maybe good
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:08 AM Bradley White
wrote:
>
> > Somewhat related, in the cases where an official FS road or trail
crosses private property, does the FS have an easement, or is it kind of an
informal arrangement?
>
> Best way to know for sure is ground survey, but generally USFS system
> Somewhat related, in the cases where an official FS road or trail crosses
> private property, does the FS have an easement, or is it kind of an informal
> arrangement?
Best way to know for sure is ground survey, but generally USFS system
roads & trails (also available for viewing using the
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:59 AM Bradley White
wrote:
>
> > While it certainly may exist, I'm not aware of a disparity between the
"congressionally declared boundary" and any other boundary of a NF,
including "physical land that the NF actually owns and manages." How would
anyone know where this
> While it certainly may exist, I'm not aware of a disparity between the
> "congressionally declared boundary" and any other boundary of a NF, including
> "physical land that the NF actually owns and manages." How would anyone know
> where this latter boundary is?
The declared boundaries are
6 matches
Mail list logo
