Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 7/13/2020 4:09 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote: The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least in the US, one does not drive or walk directly up to someone's house without having business there. (Someone making a delivery, obviously,

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

> On Jul 13, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Jmapb wrote: > (Trying once again to change this thread subject!) > > I'm also in the "worry about it" camp. > > To me, it's sad to see a mapper go to all the trouble of fixing the routing > to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263869602 >

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Jul 13, 2020, 20:29 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > On 13/07/2020 14.22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> If you are staying from manually reviewing >> and editing based on this new data, >> aerials and current data it should be >> perfectly fine as long as you actually review >> what you add. >> >

[Talk-us] Someone from Craigslist here?

Hi, a recent complaint to DWG led me to investigate the area around Greenville (Plumas County, Northern California), and I found that a couple TIGER streets that had been deleted on OSM in January 2019 were still visible on Craigslist (https://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/craigslist.png shows curre

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 13/07/2020 15.16, Kevin Kenny wrote: I'll confess to having perpetrated a fair number - at a time when I didn't know better. Likewise. That said... A few things, though: The immediate curtilage of a house is presumed to be private; at least in the US, one does not drive or walk directly u

Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:52 PM Jmapb wrote: > I'm also in the "worry about it" camp. > > To me, it's sad to see a mapper go to all the trouble of fixing the routing > to the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263869602 by drawing in the > driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79163365

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

On 13/07/2020 14.22, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: If you are staying from manually reviewing and editing based on this new data, aerials and current data it should be perfectly fine as long as you actually review what you add. For now, yes. For buildings (later, and I'll probably ping y'all again),

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Ok, then it should be ok. If you are staying from manually reviewing and editing based on this new data, aerials and current data it should be perfectly fine as long as you actually review  what you add. 13 Jul 2020, 20:15 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > On 13/07/2020 13.44, Mateusz Konieczny via

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

On 13/07/2020 13.44, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote: Are you sure that it is in public domain? It is according to the government POC. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports-us/2020-July/000954.html -- Matthew ___ Talk-us mailing lis

[Talk-us] access=private on driveways (was: Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes)

On 7/13/2020 12:59 PM, Alex Hennings wrote: The /sole purpose/ of routing is to get the user to their destination without breaking any laws. These are also /specifically my/ /goals /when I'm using a router. Frequently (in my rural area) getting to my destination requires using a privately owned

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

Are you sure that it is in public domain? Is it work of federal government? Or a state government? 13 Jul 2020, 16:48 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com: > (Repost to talk-us also.) > > On 13/07/2020 10.44, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > >> I am working on a project that wishes to tentatively use OSM data fr

Re: [Talk-us] Deleting tiger:reviewed=no/addr:street for routes (was: Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?)

Kevin, Maybe we have different contexts? In my area, we have privately owned roads that are more than just driveways. Regarding: "*don't worry about it*" I find this dissatisfying. The *sole purpose* of routing is to get the user to their destination

Re: [Talk-us] Importing data for Prince William County, VA

(Repost to talk-us also.) On 13/07/2020 10.44, Matthew Woehlke wrote: I am working on a project that wishes to tentatively use OSM data from Quantico and possibly surrounding areas. Unfortunately, OSM is somewhat lacking in this area, especially within Quantico itself. I would like to import