Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

2020-10-15 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:48 PM Mark Brown wrote: > I've noticed that the US Topo Maps are way out of date before - whole > rivers have shifted since the version that displays on JSOM was last > compiled. Still, like TIGER roads, it's better than nothing I guess. > No surprise. USGS was

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

2020-10-15 Thread Mark Brown
I've checked the latest topo maps from the US Forestry Service website - the trail number annotations remain but the "Pack" annotation is gone, so will delete those annotations. I've noticed that the US Topo Maps are way out of date before - whole rivers have shifted since the version that

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

2020-10-15 Thread stevea
On Oct 15, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > Many of the old "pack trail" labeled features near my home-town are now > overgrown and barely usable. I would be skeptical about the utility of this > tag - mappers will need to survey the trail in person before suggesting that > it is

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

2020-10-15 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Many of the old "pack trail" labeled features near my home-town are now overgrown and barely usable. I would be skeptical about the utility of this tag - mappers will need to survey the trail in person before suggesting that it is currently suitable for horse, mules or other pack animals. -Joseph

Re: [Talk-us] Reference numbers to use for hiking trail route relations

2020-10-15 Thread stevea
brad wrote > I think I've seen old usgs topo maps, or perhaps FS maps with trails labeled > as pack trails. Not quite sure what it means, probably nothing anymore. > Perhaps the OSM person just used the info from the old map. A "pack trail" is suitable for pack animals, such as donkeys or