Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:58:22 -0700 Paul Johnson wrote: > Well, in some cases, because due to historical factors, some highways > have the same name despite having radically different route > references, and the names don't apply to the whole relation, but > members of the relation. Why redundantl

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:39:50 -0700 Paul Johnson wrote: > Why make this more complicated than it has to be? Leave the names on > the underlying way, not the relations; leave the refs on the > relations, not the underlying ways. Then it's a matter of fixing > mapnik and t...@h to do the right thin

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:21:05 -0700 Minh Nguyen wrote: > On 4/11/09 11:38 PM, Nicholas Vetrovec wrote: > > Posted on the US Page to help coordinate US Interstate relations. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations > > > We'll need this kind of coordination for U.S. r

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:30:48 -0700 Apollinaris Schoell wrote: > > On 12 Apr 2009, at 11:14 , Joseph Jon Booker wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:31:22 -0400 > > Richard Weait wrote: > >> Perhaps direction=North|South|West|East, or cardinal=North|South| > &

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:39:45 -0700 Apollinaris Schoell wrote: > 2 relations are easier. adding role to thousands of members is a > pain. and we need to split relations with API 0.6 anyway So how do we handle the case where a US route is cosigned with an interstate? 1. add both motorways to new r

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:31:14 -0400 Greg Troxel wrote: > I don't understand what the "auxiliary list" is about. Interstates > are interstates even if they are only in one state. E.g. I-190 in > Massachusetts. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_41#Alternate_routes . I've never seen them either,

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:45:23 -0700 Paul Johnson wrote: > Joseph Jon Booker wrote: > > > Also, wouldn't it make sense to have the way a route is displayed as > > the name? For example, network=I,ref=90 would have name="I 90", and > > network=US:IL, ref=58 w

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:31:22 -0400 Richard Weait wrote: > Perhaps direction=North|South|West|East, or cardinal=North|South|West| > East? On the ways? Then what about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrong-way_concurrency#Wrong-way_concurrency ? On the relations, well, then those make sense (although

Re: [Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:54:12 -0500 Ian Dees wrote: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Nicholas Vetrovec > wrote: > > > > > Posted on the US Page to help coordinate US Interstate relations. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Interstate_Highways_Relations > > > > Since interstate highways are

Re: [Talk-us] GNIS Import

On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:01:08 -0500 Ian Dees wrote: > There's a "copy tags" feature in JOSM that doesn't seem to work. > That's about the only way I know of right now. Perhaps it is similar to potlatch, which only allows you to copy way tags to other ways, and nodes to other nodes. -- Joseph Boo

Re: [Talk-us] Anyone near Chicago area?

On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:58:27 -0500 "Praveen A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start contributing to Open Street Map project. > Currently I'm at Rolling Meadows, IL (42.051753,-88.010344). I have > got an OpenMoko FreeRunner and is figuring out how to use the GPS > features in

Re: [Talk-us] Hosting party in Chicago

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:34:39 -0700 SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know anyone in Chicago who could host a mapping party? > > Best > > Steve Any part of Chicago in particular? -- Joseph Booker signature.asc Description: PGP signature __