Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

2016-05-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Peter Dobratz wrote: > I like to confirm street names by checking for POIs along the street. > There's a Great Clips hair salon near there with the following address (see > http://www.greatclips.com/ ): > > 906 E 900 S > Salt Lake City, UT 84105

Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

2016-05-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk > Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary designation’. But now I see a > conflict. > > 1) The common tagging practice is that posted names rule. The

Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

2016-05-23 Thread Peter Dobratz
I like to confirm street names by checking for POIs along the street. There's a Great Clips hair salon near there with the following address (see http://www.greatclips.com/ ): 906 E 900 S Salt Lake City, UT 84105 I would put the following addr:* tags on that business: addr:housenumber=906

Re: [Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

2016-05-23 Thread Jack Burke
I concur. You could also put Harvey as an alt_name tag. -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology On May 23, 2016 1:03:15 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel wrote: >Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk >Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary

[Talk-us] 'Honorary' street name conflicts with posted name - how to decide

2016-05-23 Thread Martijn van Exel
Salt Lake City just renamed a part of 900 South to ‘Harvey Milk Boulevard’. This is a so-called ‘honorary designation’. But now I see a conflict. 1) The common tagging practice is that posted names rule. The signs changed to show the new honorary name: https://goo.gl/photos/xqAxQCwCmPRUGWkm9