Well, I found this asbestos dump near my hometown in Millington NJ and
that was not there before so if it was imported, where is it?
mike
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Reiser, John J. wrote:
> FYI, Georgia and New Jersey have land use/land cover data that has been
> bulk uploaded. With any
FYI, Georgia and New Jersey have land use/land cover data that has been
bulk uploaded. With any bulk uploads, please make sure that the data is
appropriate for the area and does not overlap existing data within an
area.
State level data is often better (not always, but often) than what is in
some
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com <
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> For the US, I found also a national name register, like the GNS database.
>
>
This has been imported already.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@o
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
> This is another data set that will be evolving over time and for it to
> be of value, there will need to be a way to replace line segments in
> some sort of automated way. It the import is a one-shot deal, please
> don't import the NHD for m
Hi all,
If you want to revert my edits for the EPA data feel free.
mike
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
(I thought that I would split my answers on EPA and NHD).
I know that there is already a coordinated effort on importing NHD.
Please don't upload NHD data for an area that you are not familiar
with. I am familiar with the NHD data in our area and I can tell you
that it is still receiving a large
I appreciate your enthusiasm for getting environmental data into OSM.
I think that it can have value, but only if it is done carefully and
with maintenance in mind.
The spatial accuracy of the EPA data that you uploaded is not very
good. I have to say that even in mixed-case, it really subtracts
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> I agree completely. What I did with my splitter script is to create
> one file per Item. Large lakes and things can be processed that way, I
> just sorted the resulting files and loaded the biggest one into josm.
> A splitti
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com <
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:22 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> >> The current NHD either includes these updates or is high
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Kate wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>>
>> The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this
>> historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing
>> the NHD rather than other datasets.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this
> historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing
> the NHD rather than other datasets.
>
> Also, lakes should not have a natural=coastline
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:22 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
>> The current NHD either includes these updates or is higher quality than this
>> historical stuff that the USGS has. I would recommend working on importing
>> the NHD rathe
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for
>> your review and approval.
>>
>> I have documented it here :
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/use
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com <
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Instead of importing lots of data, I have imported only one lake for
> your review and approval.
>
> I have documented it here :
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/h4ck3rm1k3/diary/8927
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
