On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Elliott Plack
wrote:
> I am glad this conversation has restarted. A few of you, (Me, Paul,
> others..) will recall a similar conversation on the openstreetmap-carto
> repo a few years ago where I noted that there are simply too many of
I am glad this conversation has restarted. A few of you, (Me, Paul,
others..) will recall a similar conversation on the openstreetmap-carto
repo a few years ago where I noted that there are simply too many of these
micro airports shown on the map. We discussed at great length how the
relative
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Martijn van Exel [160412 16:29]:
> > Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small
> airfield can be hard to verify from imagery - [..]
>
> one more thing to
* Paul Norman [160412 17:27]:
> On 4/12/2016 2:40 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Paul Norman wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure here. For small airfields the aeroway=aerodrome
> > feature is a fairly abstract thing essentially indicating only that
> > this is a place where aircrafts start or land. This is not
> > generally something that can be reliably
On 4/12/2016 2:40 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
>first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
>obviously no airport or airfield.
I am not sure
Hi,
* Martijn van Exel [160412 16:29]:
> Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
> can be hard to verify from imagery - [..]
one more thing to check: If the node was imported from GNIS, check the GNIS
website searching for the feature id.
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback. I understand that the existence of an small airfield
can be hard to verify from imagery - but I am also wondering what the value of
this unverified and stale data is to OSM. If they were mapper surveyed nodes to
begin with I would perhaps feel the need to be
On Tuesday 12 April 2016, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the
> first time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
> obviously no airport or airfield.
I am not sure here. For small airfields the aeroway=aerodrome
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 11:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
>
>> Can we really be sure there is no airfield, just because we don't see
>>> anything in the aerial imagery? Isn't this maybe also a legal
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> 2016-04-12 4:50 GMT+02:00 Martijn van Exel :
>
>> I was mapping some rural area in the U.S. and noticed, not for the first
>> time, an aerodrome node in the middle of a field where there is
11 matches
Mail list logo