Bryce Nesbitt writes:
Again, all I see is a well meaning user who very clearly is not yet
absorbed OSM culture.
There is no belligerence, just a bit of confusion.
It is easy to slip into misunderstanding. Perhaps such gaffes can be
chalked up to a sort of culture clash. These usually end
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16078863
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16080822
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16495595
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16497029
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16540719
I've tried to be civil
What's your more specific concern, and what wording have you tried?
Is your concern the future shopping centers as a concept, or the way they
are tagged?
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16078863
They seem to put in a lot of future things using tags that imply
something is currently there. On top of that, they use the wrong tags
(landuse=industrial instead of landuse=retail). They've also screwed up a
bit of TX 71 and US 290, removing them from relations, in an erroneous
attempt to make
I'll let his comments here[1] on a note page speak.
- James
[1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/3173
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Oh, that is rich: NE2 saying that somebody ELSE has a history of
gun-jumping Wow, the mote in one's eye!
SteveA
California
I'll let his comments here[1] on a note page speak.
- James
[1] -
Folks, talk-us@ is a place for discussion, not personal attacks.
If you have a problem with a particular user, contact the user and if they
don't respond e-mail d...@osmfoundation.org.
Do not come here to laugh at anyone or their contributions to our dataset.
-Your friendly talk-us@ mod
On
Folks, talk-us@ is a place for discussion, not personal attacks.
If you have a problem with a particular user, contact the user and
if they don't respond e-mail
mailto:d...@osmfoundation.orgd...@osmfoundation.org.
Apologies to all. I did/do not wish to attack anybody, just note
what seemed
SteveA,
This message is completely off topic and goes in direct contradiction with
my previous message.
You have been temporarily moderated as a result.
-Your friendly talk-us@ mod
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
**
Folks, talk-us@ is a place for
In the most sincere way: apology accepted. I truly will be quite
careful to follow these (and all talk-us) guidelines in the future to
avoid misunderstandings.
SteveA
California
SteveA, I apologize for jumping on your post so quickly. I was
frustrated that you posted an off-topic comment
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.comwrote:
I'll let his comments here[1] on a note page speak
Again, all I see is a well meaning user who very clearly is not yet
absorbed OSM culture.
There is no belligerence, just a bit of confusion.
The tools could
I agree that OSM needs to be more noob-proof than Wikipedia. Erroneously
changing one thing on Wikipedia won't make much of a difference, whereas
erroneously changing one thing on OSM could throw off a lot of software
that depends on the data being correct. There's only so far OpenStreetMap
can go
12 matches
Mail list logo
