Very nice. I did not know about that convention. Will use in the future
for sure.
Zeke
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> According to the Key:source page on the wiki, an object can have
> multiple source tags. So if you go out and survey a TIGER road and
> discover that
According to the Key:source page on the wiki, an object can have
multiple source tags. So if you go out and survey a TIGER road and
discover that the name is incorrect you could change the name and add
a "source:name=survey" tag. I guess this allows you to distinguish the
source of specific element
The way I see it, any given feature may have many components to it's data.
With a road you've got the geometry, name, classification, surface, etc…. .
These components may all come from one source, or they make come from
several. If the road is unmodified since the TIGER import then the source
of
Josh Kraayenbrink writes:
> I have been thinking, possibly incorrectly, about attribution on data. The
> Tiger import was great, but as you all know, not perfectly accurate. I have
> been "reviewing" and almost all roads, ways, etc that have been imported in
> my area are now corrected. The prob
This is in relation to Lars' question with attribution on nodes and ways.
I have been thinking, possibly incorrectly, about attribution on data. The
Tiger import was great, but as you all know, not perfectly accurate. I have
been "reviewing" and almost all roads, ways, etc that have been imported
5 matches
Mail list logo