On 10/21/2011 03:27 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexander Roalter wrote:
I'll be pushing Michigan back for a bit and continue westwards of Iowa.
FYI I've already relationalized the counties in most states west of
Iowa. The first few I did I did not combine with the
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexander Roalter wrote:
> I'll be pushing Michigan back for a bit and continue westwards of Iowa.
FYI I've already relationalized the counties in most states west of
Iowa. The first few I did I did not combine with the state boundaries
though. I was planning on d
Am 18.10.2011 13:43, schrieb Greg Troxel:
I would recommend contacting the MN state gis department, which might be
part of the state highway department. There are probably people there
who understand the rules and can point you to them. Someone from
MassGIS was very helpful when I had question
OK, "hoping" would be more accurate than "assuming" :) Thanks for finding
the general statutes online, Nathan!
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 8:44 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
>
>> the Census has county boundaries going to the state border with WI/MI,
>>
On 10/18/2011 8:44 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
the Census has county boundaries going to the state border with WI/MI, and I'm
assuming they did their homework.
Don't assume anything when it comes to TIGER.
Anyway, Cook County was defined in 1874 to include the water to the
state line: http:/
About Minnesota's counties on Lake Superior, the Census has county
boundaries going to the state border with WI/MI, and I'm assuming they did
their homework. Still, I'll try to double check the legal definitions
today. Brad
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I would recomme
I would recommend contacting the MN state gis department, which might be
part of the state highway department. There are probably people there
who understand the rules and can point you to them. Someone from
MassGIS was very helpful when I had questions about town lines.
As an example which won
Alexander Roalter writes:
> Shouldn't county borders always coincide with state borders? In the
> case of the Minnesota/Iowa border, there were often differences up to
> 150 meters. I then used the state borders as the 'better' solution and
> extended/capped the county lines. What would be the b
On 10/18/11 5:43 AM, Alexander Roalter wrote:
I recently started converting the Iowa and Minnesota county borders
from simple ways to correct boundary relations, which means also
removing the doubled ways the adjacent areas share.
So far, so good, but I encountered some questions:
Shouldn't c
I recently started converting the Iowa and Minnesota county borders from
simple ways to correct boundary relations, which means also removing the
doubled ways the adjacent areas share.
So far, so good, but I encountered some questions:
Shouldn't county borders always coincide with state border
10 matches
Mail list logo
