To be clear about USBR 11 in Maryland: for source data, this OSM author looked
at many things, including a combination of text-based instructions and the
red-yellow-green lines published by Maryland DOT and OSM’s own data like
Elliott’s tags to my FIXME tags. This author also finds it prudent
Kerry
-Original Message-
From: OSM Volunteer stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 3:02 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Cc: Kerry Irons ; Elliott Plack
; Wade ; FTA/Ethan
; Phil! Gold
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Is USBR 11 in Maryland complete/correct in OSM
ons
> Cc: Elliott Plack ; OSM Volunteer stevea
> ; Wade ; FTA/Ethan
> ; Phil! Gold ;
> talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Is USBR 11 in Maryland complete/correct in OSM?
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kerry Irons wrote:
>> The NB route uses Keep Trys
To: Kerry Irons
Cc: Elliott Plack ; OSM Volunteer stevea
; Wade ; FTA/Ethan
; Phil! Gold ; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Is USBR 11 in Maryland complete/correct in OSM?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kerry Irons mailto:irons54vor...@gmail.com> > wrote:
The NB rout
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Kerry Irons
wrote:
> The NB route uses Keep Tryst Rd. west from the path to connect with US 340
> for about 1,500 ft. headed east and then onto the ramp to SR 67. The SB
> route takes the right hand ramp from the southern end of SR 67 onto US 340
> for about 500
Recognize that the small sign is not a USBR sign. In your first link I could
find no bike route sign unless it is that sign way off in the distance that I
can’t make out.
Kerry Irons
From: Elliott Plack [mailto:elliott.pl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 3:03 PM
To: Kerry
On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> I've been out there a few times taking Mapillary photos along the route so
> you can see some of the bike signage.
> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/3Aq9dVh3Av7K_di9KKUudQ/photo
Thanks for doing this! (Ah, rural Maryland, so pretty).
> Thi
I've been out there a few times taking Mapillary photos along the route so
you can see some of the bike signage.
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/3Aq9dVh3Av7K_di9KKUudQ/photo
This tiny one is my favorite. It's so small compared to the massive BGS:
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8I80lkxdGCOgfsOCKDy
Just to echo Steve’s comment on signs: encouraged but not required. Currently
just under 18% of the USBRS is signed. Budget is the issue, both at the state
and local (non state highway) level.
Kerry
From: OSM Volunteer stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2
Ah, my spell-check is to blame!
“non” should be ncn
“lcm” should be lcm
“a bicycle router showing” should be “a bicycle renderer showing”
SteveA
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Whoops, a couple typos back there:
“non” should be non
“lcm” should be lcn
SteveA
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Elliott Plack wrote:
> Update on this. I was out along the AT in the Weverton area and had a chance
> to observe this unique condition where cyclists are encouraged to use what is
> effectively a motorway for travel.
I always found my armchair mapping of this highly suspect and so I added
cop
Steve and Friends,
Update on this. I was out along the AT in the Weverton area and had a
chance to observe this unique condition where cyclists are encouraged to
use what is effectively a motorway for travel.
There is no sign or specific indication of USBR 11 anywhere out there that
I observed. W
13 matches
Mail list logo
