Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Send me a OSM shirt or something and I'll be happy to throw it on over my fursuit for publicity purposes. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Greg Morgan wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

There definitely has to be an emoji process! On Feb 24, 2016 4:08 PM, "Greg Morgan" wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:58 PM, alyssa wright >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:58 PM, alyssa wright > wrote: > >> We're also accepting nominations for next year's OSM US pet mascot. > > > I nominate me ! > Paul,

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 4:58 PM, alyssa wright wrote: > We're also accepting nominations for next year's OSM US pet mascot. I nominate me ! ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Paul Norman > wrote: > On 2016-02-22 12:38 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > As has been mentioned before, the LWG and OSMF were and are involved in this >

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Paul Norman wrote: > On 2016-02-22 12:38 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> As has been mentioned before, the LWG and OSMF were and are involved in >> this process. >> > > The OSMF is not formally involved in the process, through the LWG or > otherwise.

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On 2016-02-22 12:38 AM, Ian Dees wrote: As has been mentioned before, the LWG and OSMF were and are involved in this process. The OSMF is not formally involved in the process, through the LWG or otherwise. OpenStreetMap US is free to engage with law students to ask legal questions about

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > We took that to heart and pushed the minutes to our wiki page soon after > you asked about it, but I forgot to let you and the community know that we > did it. > > Our minutes are here: >

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Alyssa, > I will be out of the country with iffy internet service on Wed but would > otherwise like to join the call. Would you mind if we solicit questions > ahead of time that we could have discuss? I have two

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

> On Feb 21, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Steve Coast > wrote: > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the > original briefing

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Hi Steve, On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the > original briefing since they’ve moved beyond that. But I’m not sure that’s > better, since it sounds like there is no documentation

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Also, I believe I linked to the document you're referring to in the wiki announcement? I could be confusing documents here... apologies if I am. > On Feb 21, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Steve Coast wrote: > > Ian > > I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Thanks Steve. Come join us for the town hall on Wednesday! And if you have time to write a community brief as we define the student work that would be great. This was never meant to be a secret and your help in making this success is appreciated. Now have to hop on a plane. Excuse the

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Thanks Clifford. We will definitely include those questions and will make sure to publish the group's responses. Also, I think Alex had the latest update on public minutes and financials. As with all our efforts with transparency this was not are attempt to hide anything but probably lack of

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Ian I was just emailed privately to say there's hesitation to release the original briefing since they’ve moved beyond that. But I’m not sure that’s better, since it sounds like there is no documentation and it’s still the same agenda. Also, I’m on the LWG and I saw the emails to the OSMF so

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Alyssa, I will be out of the country with iffy internet service on Wed but would otherwise like to join the call. Would you mind if we solicit questions ahead of time that we could have discuss? I have two question or maybe they are really concerns. One of my concern is that the legal opinions I

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

Hi Steve, I assure you that there is nothing secret about this process, its intentions, or the result. If you read the blog post (0) and the wiki page (1) that Alyssa posted you will find as much information as we have right now. Heck, you can even come talk to us face to face at the town hall

Re: [Talk-us] Legal Research

It should be pointed out again that this research, based on a - still secret - brief by a company, didn’t happen via the LWG. Hopefully one day we’ll be able to build an open process using real lawyers, instead of secret agendas pushed via students. Best Steve > On Feb 21, 2016, at 3:58 PM,

[Talk-us] Legal Research

Hi all, Exciting news here! The OSM US board has partnered with the cyber law clinic at Harvard University Law School for some cyber law research.  We are working with two talented young women who bring legal learning and perspective to