On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Alan Mintz
> wrote:
> At 2009-10-14 17:14, Dale Puch wrote:Yup. I describe the OSM project and
> then specifically what I want to do. I'm concerned, though, that the answer
> I sometimes get is from someone that may not be qualified or allowed to give
> the answer
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
> lines when you zoom in.
>
> http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
>
> Would using those kind of data be better than using the TIGER
some counties have detailed parcel data and even building outlines with
adress data.
someone imported a nice example in Mono county
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.645611&lon=-118.975286&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
but some buildings have only dummy adress and are 0.
other counties offer data too
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2009-10-14 17:14, Dale Puch wrote:
>
> Yep, check the property appraiser office for the county, Usually the only
> original source for such data.
> For my county http://paraster.ocpafl.org/Webmap2/default.aspx Be sure to
> check out the 6" p
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:20:46PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
> lines when you zoom in.
>
> http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
>
> Would using those kind of data be better than using
At 2009-10-14 17:14, Dale Puch wrote:
Yep, check the property appraiser
office for the county, Usually the only original source for such
data.
For my county
http://paraster.ocpafl.org/Webmap2/default.aspx
Be sure to check out the 6" per pixel aerial view as well as birds
eye, and links to google
I did not see the property lines on google either.
Yep, check the property appraiser office for the county, Usually the only
original source for such data.
For my county http://paraster.ocpafl.org/Webmap2/default.aspx Be sure to
check out the 6" per pixel aerial view as well as birds eye, and lin
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> At 2009-10-14 16:20, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
>>lines when you zoom in.
>>
>>http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
>
> I'm not seeing that
At 2009-10-14 16:20, Dave Hansen wrote:
>I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
>lines when you zoom in.
>
>http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
I'm not seeing that, but...
>Would using those kind of data be better than usi
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
> lines when you zoom in.
>
> http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
>
> Would using those kind of data be better than using the TIGE
I noticed that when Google rev'd their maps, they also magically got lot
lines when you zoom in.
http://maps.google.com/?ll=44.952442,-123.027169&spn=0.001619,0.002044&z=19
Would using those kind of data be better than using the TIGER data for
addressing? Any idea how Google got those data?
--
11 matches
Mail list logo