On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
> Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both
> imply limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a
> good first approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges enough
> from OSM tagg
Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both imply
limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a good first
approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges enough from OSM tagging
standards/consensus (such as it is in the US, anyway) th
On Mar 5, 2017 13:35, "OSM Volunteer stevea"
wrote:
I would say "almost, but not quite." Interstate and Freeway, both
highway=motorway. Expressway, highway=trunk.
If it's semi limited access (few to no driveways, a mix of at grade and
grade separated junctions), I would call that a trunk. J
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 3:46 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.
Hi,
On 03/05/2017 10:08 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I'm not a vehement anti-importer (there a
Hi,
On 03/05/2017 10:08 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I'm not a vehement anti-importer (there are a few around here
I don't know what you are talking about ;)
> There are "county
> highways" that you'd expect to be highway=tertiary that are in fact
> highway=track, for instance.
Or the myriad "highw
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:55 PM, wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads
> to. Basically the following:
>
>
>
> MODOT : OSM
>
>
>
> Interstate : motorway
>
> Freeway and Expressway : trunk
>
> Other Principal Arterial : primary
>
> Minor Arterial :
> I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads to.
> Basically the following:
>
> MODOT : OSM
>
> Interstate : motorway
> Freeway and Expressway : trunk
> Other Principal Arterial : primary
> Minor Arterial : secondary
> Major Collector : tertiary
> Minor Collecto
On 3/5/17 8:22 AM, Mike N wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM
> classification, and often conflict.
>
> If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it
> should be motorway.
>
> If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be
> un
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Mike N wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM classification,
> and often conflict.
>
> If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it should
> be motorway.
>
The american concept of freeways is unambiguous,
Hi,
Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM
classification, and often conflict.
If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it
should be motorway.
If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be unclassified
because it doesn't serve residenc
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads
> to. Basically the following:
>
>
>
> MODOT : OSM
>
>
>
> Interstate : motorway
>
> Freeway and Expressway : trunk
>
> Other Principal Arterial : primary
>
> Minor Arterial : s
I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads to.
Basically the following:
MODOT : OSM
Interstate : motorway
Freeway and Expressway : trunk
Other Principal Arterial : primary
Minor Arterial : secondary
Major Collector : tertiary
Minor Collector : unclassified
Local
12 matches
Mail list logo