Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 11:59 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > By the way you should probably remove the toll=yes and fee=$3.50 tags > from this portion of road (in both directions). I'd do it but... Sure, I'll take care if it shortly, I've got a bunch of mapping to do this weekend. Before that, something I w

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

2010 00:00 To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is? On 12/14/2010 10:53 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Paul Johnson <mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org>> wrote: > > > As far as Creek Turnpike and

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Thanks for citing government data on this one, though. A couple > suggestions I would make would be to use much smaller changesets and > more relevant changeset comments, so people who are mapping on the > ground can follow what you're doing

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 11:56 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > Based on your addition of the sign (thanks for adding it) it's only > 500 feet (150 m) from the exit ramp, which is where OSM currently has > US 169 ending (and where the relation has had it ending since well > before this little brouhaha). This is

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

By the way you should probably remove the toll=yes and fee=$3.50 tags from this portion of road (in both directions). I'd do it but... ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > I just drove it (since there's no traffic right now and it's in my > neighborhood). The END 169 sign is approximately 790m east of Memorial > Drive, so it's after the interchange, but before you reach Memorial > Drive, approximately ¾ of the

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

Another thing I should mention, proof of surveying for the sign can be found at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Paul%20Johnson/traces/884510. As soon as I find a suitable dash cam or volunteer to ride shotgun, I'll get video. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 10:59 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/14/2010 10:53 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Paul Johnson >> > > wrote: >> >> > As far as Creek Turnpike and US 169, pics or it doesn't exist. >> >> Certainly, but given that

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 10:53 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > > > As far as Creek Turnpike and US 169, pics or it doesn't exist. > > Certainly, but given that stopping is prohibited and there is a minimum > sp

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 05:44 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > Thanks for joining in without any knowledge of the area or situation. Same could be said of you; when was the last time you were in Tulsa? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > As far as Creek Turnpike and US 169, pics or it doesn't exist. > > Certainly, but given that stopping is prohibited and there is a minimum > speed limit, how do you propose these be taken? Dash mounted hands free video seems safer than e

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 05:38 PM, Jeff Harris wrote: > As far as Creek Turnpike and US 169, pics or it doesn't exist. Certainly, but given that stopping is prohibited and there is a minimum speed limit, how do you propose these be taken? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 06:51 PM, Anthony wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Paul Johnson > wrote: >> On 12/14/2010 08:47 AM, Anthony wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Paul Johnson >>> wrote: Besides that, when do you plan on citing a source that isn't copyrighted when you're m

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/14/2010 08:47 AM, Anthony wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Paul Johnson >> wrote: >>> Besides that, when do you plan on citing a source that isn't copyrighted >>> when you're mapping?  If that's your only source, you can't us

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

Thanks for joining in without any knowledge of the area or situation. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Jeff Harris wrote: ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, It seems to me that there is at least one person here who had decided that his sole purpose is to stir shit up. Reference the recent "Tagging bicycle anti-routes" discussion and this thread. Let's all just pick some random area, find a website t

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/14/2010 12:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Paul Johnson >> wrote: >>> On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: And US 169: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83581697 was missing

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 08:47 AM, Anthony wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: >> Besides that, when do you plan on citing a source that isn't copyrighted >> when you're mapping? If that's your only source, you can't use it: >> That's plagerism. > > I thought plagiarism is when

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Besides that, when do you plan on citing a source that isn't copyrighted > when you're mapping?  If that's your only source, you can't use it: > That's plagerism. I thought plagiarism is when you *don't* cite your sources. __

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 08:21 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/14/2010 12:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Paul Johnson >> wrote: >>> On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: And US 169: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83581697 was missing a ref tag

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 12:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: >> On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >>> And US 169: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83581697 was >>> missing a ref tag. >> >> None of the Creek Turnpike is part of US 16

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> And US 169: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83581697 was >> missing a ref tag. > > None of the Creek Turnpike is part of US 169, it's southern terminus is > at Creek Turnpike. Nope -

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/14/2010 12:16 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Paul Johnson >> wrote: >>> On 12/13/2010 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, which was cut

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Paul Johnson > wrote: >> On 12/13/2010 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >>> I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, >>> which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansas for a few >

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On 12/13/2010 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, >> which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansas for a few >> months. > > OK, so why did that same edit wind up in T

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/13/2010 02:45 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Toby Murray > wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II >> wrote: >>> I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, >>> which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansa

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On 12/13/2010 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: >> You wrote "US relation fixup etc" as the changeset comment for this, and >> it covers almost all of the lower 48. What is actually going on with >> this changeset? > > I fixed up some of

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, >> which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansas for a few >> months. > > Hmm it wasn't me who broke US 24

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, > which was cut down to a couple ways in western Kansas for a few > months. Hmm it wasn't me who broke US 24 out west, was it? I have been known to tinker with I-70 out t

Re: [Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > You wrote "US relation fixup etc" as the changeset comment for this, and > it covers almost all of the lower 48. What is actually going on with > this changeset? I fixed up some of the U.S. Highway relations, most notably US 24, which was cu

[Talk-us] NE2: Changeset 6612910: What is?

You wrote "US relation fixup etc" as the changeset comment for this, and it covers almost all of the lower 48. What is actually going on with this changeset? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstr