On 4/26/2011 12:50 PM, Ben Supnik wrote:
Richard's idea of building an NHD tile map for tracing seems very
do-able, but it wouldn't save a ton of time - every water feature would
have to be hand-traced, even though we do have them in vector form already.
I'm not at all comfortable with the co
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 12:50:41 Ben Supnik wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> From what I can tell:
>
> - Every water body does get a reach ID. I've seen nulls in this file
> but haven't yet figured out what they are...in local sample areas, all
> water bodies have reach IDs.
>
> - If there is linkeage
Hi Y'all,
From what I can tell:
- Every water body does get a reach ID. I've seen nulls in this file
but haven't yet figured out what they are...in local sample areas, all
water bodies have reach IDs.
- If there is linkeage between areas and flow lines (which I _thought_
there was when rea
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 09:35:00 Ian Dees wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Ben Supnik wrote:
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > Where on the OSM servers is the current NHD data, and in what format? I
> > didn't see it referenced in the wiki work-flow.
>
> They're currently only used to render TopOSM
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Ben Supnik wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Where on the OSM servers is the current NHD data, and in what format? I
> didn't see it referenced in the wiki work-flow.
They're currently only used to render TopOSM and aren't available via HTTP
or whatnot. I had plans to conve
Hi Ian,
Where on the OSM servers is the current NHD data, and in what format? I
didn't see it referenced in the wiki work-flow.
- Not all of the data types contain enough information to split like
this (last I checked the linear features were the only ones with reach
code. Polygonal features
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik wrote:
>>
>> Hi Y'all,
>>
>> The USGS was kind enough to send me the latest shapefile extract for the
>> NHD yesterday. So my question is: is there some way I can process and
>> repost this data that w
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:20 AM, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2011 09:09:21 Ian Dees wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik
> wrote:
> Snip
> > > I could rehost the NHD files on my company's servers for a while,
> perhaps
> > > even in .osm format.
> > >
> Snip
>
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 09:09:21 Ian Dees wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik wrote:
Snip
> > I could rehost the NHD files on my company's servers for a while, perhaps
> > even in .osm format.
> >
Snip
> We have NHD from circa last year on the OSMF US servers. It may be useful
>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ben Supnik wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> The USGS was kind enough to send me the latest shapefile extract for the
> NHD yesterday. So my question is: is there some way I can process and
> repost this data that would make it more suitable for importers?
>
There already
Hi Y'all,
The USGS was kind enough to send me the latest shapefile extract for the
NHD yesterday. So my question is: is there some way I can process and
repost this data that would make it more suitable for importers?
I read the wiki pages on NHD imports a few weeks ago, but found the USGS
11 matches
Mail list logo
