If you're OK with using non-rendering tags you should use the
established boundary=protected_area instead of something US specific (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Protect_classes_for_various_countries
). If you want it to render the convention I've been using
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a
boundary=national_park[3] around it with a name tag, so it would be a
little easier to find. But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
boundary=national_historic_site
boundary=national_historic_park
boundary=national_forest[1]
There are 37 classes in total, most of them with only a few instances.
What do y'all think of that idea?
Perhaps add a
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
boundary=national_historic_site
boundary=national_historic_park
boundary=national_forest[1]
There are 37 classes in total, most of them
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Perhaps add a us: prefix to the value?
boundary=us:national_historic_site
boundary=us:national_historic_park
boundary=us:national_forest
I like that idea, in spite of the
On 07/23/2012 12:50 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Martijn all,
I rather like the samples you gave:
boundary=national_historic_site
boundary=national_historic_park
etc.
They are simple, straightforward, and unambiguous. (The pattern could
also be extended to other boundary types.)
In the Forest
Hi all,
I was looking at the Golden Spike National Historic Site[1], of
particular interest because the Union Pacific railroad celebrates its
150th birthday this year[2]. While elements are represented in OSM[3],
a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a
On 7/22/2012 7:39 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more than a dozen other categories[4].
Is this something to consider for importing?
I am in favor of importing park
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 7/22/2012 7:39 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more than a dozen other categories[4].
Is this
a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a
boundary=national_park[3] around it with a name tag, so it would be a
little easier to find. But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing about the several renderers we currently have is that they can't
be expected to take every possible mapped feature into account. The map
would just get too cluttered. I think for a general street map (the
Nathan,
This is something that has bugged me about Mapnik and Osmarender as well. I
think you should start a wiki page about this issue.
The thing about the several renderers we currently have is that they can't
be expected to take every possible mapped feature into account. The map
would just
12 matches
Mail list logo
